Gauderer Michael W L
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital, Greenville Hospital System, University Medical Center, Greenville, South Carolina 29605-4253, USA.
Am Surg. 2007 Aug;73(8):814-7.
Whether an appendectomy should be performed "open" or laparoscopically is the subject of considerable debate. This study in children was undertaken to test the hypothesis that an individualized approach, based on disease stage, body habitus, and laparoscopic findings should dictate the removal technique. Data on 108 consecutive pediatric appendectomies were prospectively recorded. Except in complex cases, a 5 mm laparoscope was inserted umbilically, the findings were evaluated, and the best removal approach was selected. Depending on the degree of inflammation and mobility, the appendix was fully delivered and resected, either through the initial umbilical trocar site or, more commonly, through a second right lower quadrant (RLQ) trocar site. The second RLQ trocar incision was enlarged for limited or full conversion to an open approach, if needed. In overweight children, three trocars and a stapler were used. Children (63 boys, 45 girls) ranged in age from 3 to 18 years (mean, 11 years). A single umbilical port was used in 16 patients with low-grade appendiceal inflammation. A two trocar, laparoscopically-assisted appendectomy was used in 63 cases. Of these 63, a limited extension of the RLQ trocar incision was necessary in 4 patients and conversion to an open incision was needed in 4 children. The three trocar technique was used 21 times. Twelve of these were cases involving obese patients. A stapler was used 13 times. Four trocars were needed once. Seven patients with complex appendicitis did not undergo laparoscopy. Twenty-nine appendices were perforated, and there were 3 complications: 2 intra-abdominal abscesses and one trocar site wound infection. Because appendiceal disease is a spectrum, and children encompass a wide range of ages and sizes, an individualized approach, based on the anatomical parameters and the clinical and laparoscopic findings, allows for an efficient, patient-specific appendectomy: single trocar for minimally inflamed appendices, two trocars for the most common types, three trocars plus a stapler for overweight children, and an "open" procedure for complex cases.
阑尾炎手术应采用“开放”方式还是腹腔镜方式进行,这是一个备受争议的话题。本项针对儿童的研究旨在验证以下假设:基于疾病阶段、身体形态和腹腔镜检查结果的个体化方法应决定阑尾切除技术。前瞻性记录了连续108例小儿阑尾切除术的数据。除复杂病例外,在脐部插入一个5毫米的腹腔镜,评估检查结果,并选择最佳的切除方法。根据炎症程度和阑尾活动度,通过最初的脐部套管针穿刺点,或者更常见的是通过右下腹(RLQ)第二个套管针穿刺点,将阑尾完整取出并切除。如有需要,可扩大右下腹第二个套管针切口,以便有限度地或完全转为开放手术方式。对于超重儿童,使用三个套管针和一个吻合器。患儿年龄在3至18岁之间(平均11岁),其中男孩63例,女孩45例。16例轻度阑尾炎症患者采用单脐部端口手术。63例采用双套管针腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术。在这63例中,4例患者需要有限度地扩大右下腹套管针切口,4例患儿需要转为开放切口。三套管针技术使用了21次。其中12例为肥胖患者。使用吻合器13次。仅1例需要四个套管针。7例复杂性阑尾炎患者未接受腹腔镜检查。29例阑尾穿孔,出现3例并发症:2例腹腔内脓肿和1例套管针穿刺点伤口感染。由于阑尾疾病情况多样,且儿童年龄跨度大、体型各异,基于解剖参数以及临床和腹腔镜检查结果的个体化方法能够实现高效、针对患者个体的阑尾切除术:对于炎症最轻的阑尾采用单套管针,对于最常见类型采用双套管针,对于超重儿童采用三套管针加吻合器,对于复杂病例采用“开放”手术。