McCulloch D L, Mackie R T, Dutton G N, Bradnam M S, Day R E, McDaid G J, Phillips S, Napier A, Herbert A M, Saunders K J, Shepherd A J
Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007 Oct;49(10):757-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00757.x.
Children with neurological impairments often have visual deficits that are difficult to quantify. We have compared visual skills evaluated by carers with results of a comprehensive visual assessment. Participants were 76 children with mild to profound intellectual and/or motor impairment (33 males, 43 females; age range 7mo-16y; mean age 5y 1mo [SD 4y 2mo]) who completed a visual skills inventory before attending a special vision clinic. The inventory included 16 questions about visual skills and responses to familiar situations. Responses were augmented by taking a structured clinical history, compared with visual evoked potential (VEP) and/or acuity card measures of visual acuity, and examined using exploratory factor analysis. Acuity ranged from normal to no light perception, and was positively associated with responses to individual questions. After excluding four uninformative questions, an association between the remaining questions and two significant independent factors was found. Factor 1 was associated with questions about visual recognition (e.g. 'Does your child see a small silent toy?') and these items were correlated with both the VEP and acuity card thresholds. Factor 2 was associated primarily with questions about visually mediated social interactions (e.g. 'Does he/she return your silent smile?'). Evaluation of visual skills in children with neurological impairment can provide valid information about the quality of children's vision. Questions with the highest validity for predicting vision are identified.
患有神经功能障碍的儿童往往存在难以量化的视力缺陷。我们将照顾者评估的视觉技能与全面视觉评估的结果进行了比较。参与者为76名患有轻度至重度智力和/或运动障碍的儿童(33名男性,43名女性;年龄范围7个月至16岁;平均年龄5岁1个月[标准差4岁2个月]),他们在前往一家特殊视力诊所之前完成了一份视觉技能清单。该清单包括16个关于视觉技能以及对熟悉情境反应的问题。通过获取结构化临床病史来补充回答内容,并与视觉诱发电位(VEP)和/或视力表视力测量结果进行比较,然后使用探索性因素分析进行检验。视力范围从正常到无光感,并且与对各个问题的回答呈正相关。在排除四个无信息量的问题后,发现其余问题与两个显著的独立因素之间存在关联。因素1与关于视觉识别的问题相关(例如“您的孩子能看到一个小的无声玩具吗?”),并且这些项目与VEP和视力表阈值均相关。因素2主要与关于视觉介导的社交互动的问题相关(例如“他/她会回应您无声的微笑吗?”)。对患有神经功能障碍儿童的视觉技能评估可以提供有关儿童视力质量的有效信息。确定了对预测视力有效性最高的问题。