Dekkers-Sánchez P M, Hoving J L, Sluiter J K, Frings-Dresen M H W
Academic Medical Center, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, PO Box 22700, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Occup Environ Med. 2008 Mar;65(3):153-7. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.034983. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
The objective of this systematic review was to investigate which factors are associated with continued sick leave among workers on sick leave for at least 6 weeks.
A systematic literature search was performed in Medline, EMBASE and PsycINFO, based on combinations of MeSH terms and free text words. Only cohort studies of workers on sick leave for more than 6 weeks at baseline were included. Outcome was measured in terms of factors related to long-term sick leave. The factors were classified first as predisposing, precipitating or perpetuating factors, and then as individual or work-related factors. Methodological quality was assessed for all studies and the strength of the evidence for each factor was assessed using the levels of evidence rating system.
Five cohort studies fulfilled all inclusion criteria and 77 factors were investigated. Of these, 16 different significant factors associated with long-term sick leave were identified and were all classified as predisposing factors. Evidence was found for 14 individual factors and two work-related factors. The level of evidence was found to be insufficient for all factors except older age and history of sick leave, which were found to have weak evidence.
Based on this review, there is weak evidence that older age and history of sickness absence are factors associated with long-term sick leave in sick-listed employees. There is insufficient evidence for an effect of other individual or work-related factors on long-term sick leave. There are no published studies on perpetuating factors related to long-term sick leave.
本系统评价旨在调查哪些因素与病假至少6周的员工持续病假有关。
基于医学主题词(MeSH)术语和自由文本词的组合,在Medline、EMBASE和PsycINFO中进行了系统的文献检索。仅纳入基线时病假超过6周的员工队列研究。以与长期病假相关的因素来衡量结果。这些因素首先被分类为易患因素、促发因素或持续因素,然后再分为个人因素或与工作相关的因素。对所有研究的方法学质量进行评估,并使用证据水平评级系统评估每个因素的证据强度。
五项队列研究符合所有纳入标准,共调查了77个因素。其中,确定了16个与长期病假相关的不同显著因素,均被分类为易患因素。发现了14个个人因素和2个与工作相关的因素的证据。除年龄较大和病假史外,所有因素的证据水平均不足,而年龄较大和病假史的证据较弱。
基于本评价,有较弱的证据表明年龄较大和病假史是与列入病假名单的员工长期病假相关的因素。没有足够的证据表明其他个人或与工作相关的因素对长期病假有影响。关于与长期病假相关的持续因素,尚无已发表的研究。