Vriesendorp Reinout, Cohen Adam, Kristanto Paulus, Vrijens Bernard, Rakesh Pande, Anand Bene, Iwebor Henry Uchechukwaka, Stiekema Jacobus
Centre for Human Drug Research, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Dec;63(12):1115-21. doi: 10.1007/s00228-007-0369-2. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
This pilot study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of electronic adherence monitoring of antiretroviral medications in HIV patients who recently started Highly Active Anti Retroviral Therapy (HAART) in Francistown, Botswana and to compare this with self-reporting.
Dosing histories were compiled electronically using Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) monitors to evaluate adherence to prescribed therapies. Thirty patients enrolled in the antiretroviral treatment program were monitored over 6 weeks. These patients were all antiretroviral (ARV) naïve. After each visit (mean three times) to the pharmacy, the data compiled by the monitors were downloaded. Electronic monitoring of adherence was compared to patient self-reports of adherence.
The mean individual medication adherence level measured with the electronic device was 85% (range 21-100%). The mean adherence level measured by means of self-reporting was 98% (range 70-100%). Medication prescribed on a once-a-day dose base was associated with a higher adherence level (97.9% for efavirenz) compared with a twice-a-day regimen (88.4% for Lamivudine/Zidovudine).
It is feasible to assess treatment adherence of patients living in a low resource setting on HAART by using electronic monitors. Adherence, even in the early stages of treatment, appears to be insufficient in some patients and may be below the level required for continuous inhibition of viral replication. This approach may lead to improved targeting of counselling about their medication intake of such patients in order to prevent occurrence of resistant viral strains due to inadequate inhibition of viral replication. In this pilot study a significant difference between the data recorded through the electronic monitors and those provided by self-reporting was observed.
本试点研究旨在评估在博茨瓦纳弗朗西斯敦对近期开始高效抗逆转录病毒疗法(HAART)的艾滋病毒患者进行抗逆转录病毒药物电子依从性监测的可行性和益处,并将其与自我报告进行比较。
使用微机电系统(MEMS)监测器以电子方式汇编给药历史,以评估对规定疗法的依从性。对30名参加抗逆转录病毒治疗项目的患者进行了为期6周的监测。这些患者均未接受过抗逆转录病毒(ARV)治疗。每次(平均三次)到药房就诊后,下载监测器汇编的数据。将电子依从性监测与患者的依从性自我报告进行比较。
用电子设备测量的个体药物平均依从水平为85%(范围为21%-100%)。通过自我报告测量的平均依从水平为98%(范围为70%-100%)。与每日两次给药方案(拉米夫定/齐多夫定的依从率为88.4%)相比,每日一次给药的药物依从水平更高(依非韦伦的依从率为97.9%)。
使用电子监测器评估资源匮乏地区接受HAART治疗患者的治疗依从性是可行的。即使在治疗早期,一些患者的依从性似乎也不足,可能低于持续抑制病毒复制所需的水平。这种方法可能会改善对此类患者药物摄入咨询的针对性,以防止因病毒复制抑制不足而出现耐药病毒株。在本试点研究中,观察到通过电子监测器记录的数据与自我报告提供的数据之间存在显著差异。