Melbourne K M, Geletko S M, Brown S L, Willey-Lessne C, Chase S, Fisher A
Pharmacy Care Management, Coastal Medical, Inc, Provincetown, RI, USA.
AIDS Read. 1999 Aug;9(5):329-38.
Two measurements of adherence, patient self-report and electronic measurement by the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS), were compared in a 3-month adherence study of 44 HIV-infected patients who had been placed on regimens that included protease inhibitors (PIs). The dose percentage and degree of clinically significant dosing time fluctuation were calculated monthly. The mean dose percentage by self-report versus MEMS was 97.5% versus 90.3% during month 1 of adherence monitoring, 96.5 versus 90.1% during month 2, and 98.4% versus 92.8% during month 3. Thirty-two percent of patients taking PIs and 21% of patients taking nucleoside analogues demonstrated clinically significant dosing time fluctuation. Our data confirm that self-reports of adherence overestimate true adherence behavior, and patients' self-reports of dosing times may not accurately reflect their deviation from those times.
在一项针对44名感染HIV且已采用包含蛋白酶抑制剂(PIs)方案治疗的患者的3个月依从性研究中,对两种依从性测量方法进行了比较,即患者自我报告和通过药物事件监测系统(MEMS)进行的电子测量。每月计算剂量百分比和具有临床意义的给药时间波动程度。在依从性监测的第1个月,自我报告的平均剂量百分比与MEMS测量的分别为97.5%和90.3%;第2个月为96.5%和90.1%;第3个月为98.4%和92.8%。服用PIs的患者中有32%以及服用核苷类似物的患者中有21%出现了具有临床意义的给药时间波动。我们的数据证实,依从性的自我报告高估了真实的依从行为,并且患者对给药时间的自我报告可能无法准确反映他们与规定时间的偏差。