Marabini Laura, Frigerio Silvia, Chiesara Enzo, Maffei Francesca, Cantelli Forti Giorgio, Hrelia Patrizia, Buschini Annamaria, Martino Anna, Poli Paola, Rossi Carlo, Radice Sonia
Department of Pharmacology, Chemotherapy and Medical Toxicology E Trabucchi, University of Milan, Via Vanvitelli 32, 20129, Milan, Italy.
Mutat Res. 2007 Dec 1;634(1-2):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2007.05.017. Epub 2007 Aug 15.
When chlorine is used as a disinfectant for drinking water it may react with organic materials present in or released by the water pipes and thus form by-products that may represent a genotoxic hazard. The aim of this study was to assess the potential genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of extracts of chlorinated drinking water supplied by local aquifers of two Italian towns, Plants 1 and 2, located in the sub-Alpine area and on the Po plain, respectively. The raw water fell within the legal limits with regards to its chemical and physical properties. Water from Plant 2 contained higher levels of total organics (TOC) and nitrate than water from Plant 1. Water was sampled at different points along the distribution networks to evaluate the influence of the system on the amount and quality of the by-products. Cytotoxic and genotoxic damage was assessed in freshly isolated human white blood cells (WBC) and Hep-G2 cells by use of the micronucleus (MN) test and the Comet assay to measure primary DNA damage. While they did not show significant cytotoxicity, all Plant 1 water concentrates induced short-time genotoxic effects on leukocytes at concentrations > or =1 Lequiv./mL. Plant 2 samples were able to induce cytotoxic effects in both Hep-G2 cells and leukocytes. Furthermore, although there was no significant increase in MN frequency, DNA migration was strongly increased both in human leukocytes (> or =0.5 Lequiv./mL, 1h treatment, water samples collected from all points) and in Hep-G2 cells (> or =0.75 Lequiv./mL, 24 h treatment, tap water sampled at the nearest distribution point). The current use of these in vitro cytotoxicity/genotoxicity tests together with the normal chemical analyses could provide information to help water-works managers and health authorities evaluate drinking water quality and adopt strategies to reduce genotoxic compounds in tap water and prevent human exposure to these compounds.
当氯用作饮用水消毒剂时,它可能会与水管中存在的或由水管释放的有机物质发生反应,从而形成可能具有基因毒性危害的副产物。本研究的目的是评估分别位于亚高山地区和波河平原的意大利两个城镇(工厂1和工厂2)当地含水层供应的氯化饮用水提取物的潜在基因毒性和细胞毒性。原水的化学和物理性质符合法定限值。工厂2的水中总有机物(TOC)和硝酸盐含量高于工厂1的水。在配水网络的不同点采集水样,以评估系统对副产物数量和质量的影响。通过微核(MN)试验和彗星试验评估新鲜分离的人白细胞(WBC)和Hep-G2细胞中的细胞毒性和基因毒性损伤,以测量原发性DNA损伤。虽然它们没有显示出明显的细胞毒性,但所有工厂1的水浓缩物在浓度≥1 Lequiv./mL时均对白细胞产生短期基因毒性作用。工厂2的样品能够在Hep-G2细胞和白细胞中诱导细胞毒性作用。此外,虽然MN频率没有显著增加,但在人白细胞(≥0.5 Lequiv./mL,处理1小时,从所有点采集的水样)和Hep-G2细胞(≥0.75 Lequiv./mL,处理24小时,在最近的配水点采集的自来水)中,DNA迁移均显著增加。目前将这些体外细胞毒性/基因毒性试验与常规化学分析结合使用,可以提供信息,帮助自来水厂管理人员和卫生当局评估饮用水质量,并采取策略减少自来水中的基因毒性化合物,防止人类接触这些化合物。