Schnabel A, Bennet M, Schuster F, Roewer N, Kranke P
Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany.
Schmerz. 2008 Apr;22(2):129-32, 134-6. doi: 10.1007/s00482-007-0581-0.
The aim of this systematic review was to assess the benefits and harms of supplemental oxygen (HBOT/NBOT) for treating and preventing migraine and cluster headaches.
All randomized trials comparing the effect of supplemental oxygen on migraine or cluster headache with those that exclude supplemental oxygen were included in this review. The systematic search included all relevant sources according to the paradigms of the Cochrane Collaboration. Data were analyzed with RevMan 4.2.
Nine trials involving 201 participants satisfied the inclusion criteria. HBOT was effective in relieving an acute migraine and seemed to be sufficient in the treatment of an acute cluster attack. NBOT was effective in terminating acute cluster headache compared to sham treatment, but not in comparison to sublingual ergotamine. There was no evidence for any prophylactic effects. Serious adverse effects were not noted in the trials investigated.
There is some evidence that HBOT is effective for termination of acute migraine. NBOT was similarly effective in cluster headache, however with sparse data. Because of costs and poor availability HBOT cannot be regarded as a routine therapy. Further indications in the case of treatment failure using standard therapy need to be defined based on data of future clinical trials.
本系统评价旨在评估补充氧气(高压氧疗法/常压氧疗法)治疗和预防偏头痛及丛集性头痛的利弊。
本评价纳入了所有比较补充氧气与不使用补充氧气对偏头痛或丛集性头痛疗效的随机试验。系统检索按照Cochrane协作网的范式纳入了所有相关来源。使用RevMan 4.2进行数据分析。
9项涉及201名参与者的试验符合纳入标准。高压氧疗法对缓解急性偏头痛有效,且似乎足以治疗急性丛集性头痛发作。与假治疗相比,常压氧疗法能有效终止急性丛集性头痛,但与舌下麦角胺相比则不然。没有证据表明其有任何预防作用。在所调查的试验中未发现严重不良反应。
有证据表明高压氧疗法对终止急性偏头痛有效。常压氧疗法在丛集性头痛中同样有效,但数据较少。由于成本和可及性差,高压氧疗法不能被视为常规治疗方法。需要根据未来临床试验的数据确定在标准治疗失败情况下的进一步适应证。