Suppr超能文献

来自已故供体的抢先肾移植:相对于减少等待名单的一个优势。

Preemptive kidney transplant from deceased donors: an advantage in relation to reduced waiting list.

作者信息

Pérez-Flores I, Sánchez-Fructuoso A, Calvo N, Marques M, Anaya S, Ridao N, Rodríguez A, Barrientos A

机构信息

Nephrology Department, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2007 Sep;39(7):2123-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.06.034.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preemptive living donor kidney transplantation is associated with better allograft and recipient survival. However, it remains unclear whether preemptive transplantation from deceased donors is beneficial too. An increased number of deceased donors has reduced the waiting list in our hospital in the last years allowing preemptive deceased donor kidney transplantation (PDDKT).

AIM

We compared our experience with preemptive transplantation with patients who underwent dialysis before transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-three PDDKT, including 77.5% male patients of overall mean age of 48 +/- 14 years, were performed in our hospital between January 1999 and December 2004 (8% of transplantations). We compared the outcomes of these patients with those of renal transplants in subjects who had undergone dialysis. The donors for both groups had similar characteristic; they were paired donor kidneys in most cases.

RESULTS

The types of donors in both groups were: non-heart-beating (49%), heart-beating deceased (27%) or en bloc pediatric (24%). The serum creatinine of the recipients was 6.9 +/- 1.8 mg/dL prior to transplantation, and the creatinine clearance was 14.6 +/- 3.6 mL/min (estimated by the Cockroft-Gault formula). The Charlson comorbidity index adapted for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (ACKD) was 0.8 +/- 0.2 in the preemptive group versus 1.7 +/- 0.4 in the dialysis group (P < .05). Delayed graft function rates were 0% versus 25% in preemptive vs dialysis groups, respectively. No differences in 1-month or 1-year renal function as determined by serum creatinine were observed between the groups. We did not observe differences in the incidence of acute rejection or 1- and 2-year graft and patient survivals.

CONCLUSION

PDDKT is the treatment of choice for ACKD. It is associated with less delayed graft function and similar 2-year graft and patient survivals than kidney transplantation after dialysis. The Charlson index reflected less comorbidity among patients with PDDKT, a finding that must influence long-term outcomes.

摘要

背景

活体供肾优先肾移植与更好的移植肾和受者生存率相关。然而,目前尚不清楚来自死亡供者的优先移植是否也有益。近年来,死亡供者数量的增加减少了我院的等待名单,从而使死亡供者优先肾移植(PDDKT)成为可能。

目的

我们将优先移植的经验与移植前接受透析的患者进行了比较。

患者与方法

1999年1月至2004年12月期间,我院共进行了33例PDDKT,其中男性患者占77.5%,总体平均年龄为48±14岁(占移植总数的8%)。我们将这些患者的结局与接受透析的肾移植受者的结局进行了比较。两组的供者特征相似;大多数情况下为配对供肾。

结果

两组的供者类型为:非心脏骤停供者(49%)、心脏骤停死亡供者(27%)或整块小儿供肾(24%)。移植前受者的血清肌酐为6.9±1.8mg/dL,肌酐清除率为14.6±3.6mL/min(根据Cockcroft-Gault公式估算)。优先移植组适用于晚期慢性肾脏病(ACKD)患者的Charlson合并症指数为0.8±0.2,而透析组为1.7±0.4(P<0.05)。优先移植组与透析组的移植肾功能延迟发生率分别为0%和25%。两组之间在移植后1个月或1年时由血清肌酐所确定的肾功能方面未观察到差异。我们未观察到急性排斥反应发生率以及移植肾和患者1年及2年生存率方面的差异。

结论

PDDKT是ACKD的首选治疗方法。与透析后肾移植相比,它与移植肾功能延迟发生率较低以及2年移植肾和患者生存率相似相关。Charlson指数反映出PDDKT患者的合并症较少,这一发现必定会影响长期结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验