Cadenas Maria B, Maggi Ricardo G, Diniz Pedro P V P, Breitschwerdt Kyle T, Sontakke Sushama, Breithschwerdt Edward B
Intracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, Center for Comparative Medicine and Translational Research, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 4700 Hillsborough Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, United States.
J Microbiol Methods. 2007 Nov;71(2):147-55. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Aug 24.
In an effort to overcome historical problems associated with the isolation of Bartonella species from animal and human blood samples, our laboratory developed a novel, chemically modified, insect-based, liquid culture medium (Bartonella alpha-Proteobacteria growth medium, BAPGM). In this study, we describe the isolation of non-Bartonella bacteria from aseptically obtained human blood and tissue samples that were inoculated into BAPGM pre-enrichment culture medium, and were obtained during attempts to define each individuals Bartonella infection status. After incubation for at least 7 days in liquid BAPGM, pre-enriched inoculums were sub-cultured onto a BAPGM/blood agar plate. Bacterial DNA was extracted from pooled plated colonies and amplified using conventional PCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene. Subsequently, amplicons were cloned, sequenced and compared to GenBank database sequences using the BLAST program. Regardless of the patient's Bartonella status, seventeen samples generated only one 16S rDNA sequence, representing the following genera: Arthrobacter, Bacillus, Bartonella, Dermabacter, Methylobacterium, Propionibacterium, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus and bacteria listed as "non-cultured" in the GenBank database. Alkalibacterium, Arthrobacter, Erwinia, Kineococcus, Methylobacterium, Propionibacterium, Sphingomonas, and Staphylococcus were isolated from nine Bartonella-infected individuals. Co-isolation of Acinetobacter, Sphingomonas, Staphylococcus spp. and bacteria listed as "non-cultured" in the GenBank database was achieved for four samples in which Bartonella spp. were not detected. Despite the phylogenetic limitations of using partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species and strain identification, the investigational methodology described in this study may provide a complementary approach for the isolation and identification of bacteria from patient samples.
为努力克服与从动物和人类血液样本中分离巴尔通体菌种相关的历史问题,我们实验室开发了一种新型的、化学修饰的、基于昆虫的液体培养基(巴尔通体α-变形菌生长培养基,BAPGM)。在本研究中,我们描述了从无菌获取的人类血液和组织样本中分离非巴尔通体细菌的过程,这些样本接种到BAPGM预富集培养基中,是在试图确定每个个体的巴尔通体感染状况时获得的。在液体BAPGM中孵育至少7天后,将预富集的接种物转接至BAPGM/血琼脂平板上。从平板上合并的菌落中提取细菌DNA,并使用靶向16S rRNA基因的常规PCR进行扩增。随后,对扩增子进行克隆、测序,并使用BLAST程序与GenBank数据库序列进行比较。无论患者的巴尔通体感染状况如何,17个样本仅产生了一个16S rDNA序列,代表以下属:节杆菌属、芽孢杆菌属、巴尔通体属、皮肤杆菌属、甲基杆菌属、丙酸杆菌属、假单胞菌属、葡萄球菌属以及在GenBank数据库中列为“未培养”的细菌。从9名感染巴尔通体的个体中分离出了碱杆菌属、节杆菌属、欧文氏菌属、动球菌属、甲基杆菌属、丙酸杆菌属、鞘氨醇单胞菌属和葡萄球菌属。在4个未检测到巴尔通体属细菌的样本中,共分离出了不动杆菌属、鞘氨醇单胞菌属、葡萄球菌属以及在GenBank数据库中列为“未培养”的细菌。尽管使用部分16S rRNA基因测序进行菌种和菌株鉴定存在系统发育局限性,但本研究中描述的研究方法可能为从患者样本中分离和鉴定细菌提供一种补充方法。