Sørensen E J, Jensen O L
Eye Department, Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1991 Dec;69(6):761-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1991.tb02056.x.
This study includes two selected groups of patients operated for cataract with implantation of either a polymetacrylate (PMMA, Sinskey J-loop, prolene haptics, Mod.102H, Pharmacia) or a soft hydrogel (IO-gel, Alcon) posterior chamber lens. There were 27 patients in the PMMA group and 32 in the hydrogel lens group. The study concludes that after 1 year of observation a comparison between the two groups disclosed no major difference concerning the visual outcome and influence on the ocular tissue. No substantial observations point towards the hydrogel lens as the more biocompatible of the two lenses.
本研究纳入了两组接受白内障手术并分别植入聚甲基丙烯酸酯（PMMA，辛斯基J袢，普理灵袢，型号102H，法玛西亚公司）或软性水凝胶（IO凝胶，爱尔康公司）后房型人工晶状体的患者。PMMA组有27例患者，水凝胶晶状体组有32例患者。该研究得出结论，经过1年的观察，两组之间在视觉效果和对眼组织的影响方面没有发现重大差异。没有实质性观察结果表明水凝胶晶状体在两者中具有更高的生物相容性。
