Scharling Birgitte, Nielsen Gert G, Klitgaard Thomas, Skovsted Thor Aa, Møss Judi, Segel Stine, Larsen Lone Frost
Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2007 Oct;18(7):677-84. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e3282e7febb.
Two assays [coagulant activity of factor VII (FVII:C) and activated factor VII (FVIIa) activity] are currently available for the assessment of factor VII and FVIIa pharmacokinetics. This article presents the results of a comparison of the two assays when applied both in vitro as well as during clinical pharmacokinetic trials of recombinant FVIIa (rFVIIa) administered to healthy individuals and haemophilia patients. The in-vitro data showed that, for the FVII:C assay, plasma samples do not dilute in parallel. For the FVIIa activity assay, dilutions of samples are both parallel and linear with different dilutions of the calibrator. Moreover, intra-assay variation was found to be smaller for the FVIIa activity assay than for the FVII:C assay. When adding different amounts of rFVIIa (0-6 microg/ml) to normal plasma, a mean specific activity of rFVIIa of 48.6 U/mug was observed on applying the FVII:C assay; however, the specific activity decreased with increasing levels of rFVIIa. For the FVIIa activity assay, the mean specific activity was 45.4 IU/mug. Direct comparison of the two activity assays showed that no simple conversion between FVII:C and FVIIa activity measurements are possible. When applying the two assays for pharmacokinetic assessments in two clinical trials, statistically significant different estimates for the area under the curve, half-life, clearance and volume of distribution were obtained. In conclusion, for evaluation of rFVIIa pharmacokinetic properties, activity should be measured with the FVIIa activity assay - which is a more specific and reliable assay of the two available factor VII activity assays, especially when assessing low activity levels.
目前有两种检测方法[凝血因子VII的凝血活性(FVII:C)和活化凝血因子VII(FVIIa)活性]可用于评估凝血因子VII和FVIIa的药代动力学。本文介绍了这两种检测方法在体外以及对健康个体和血友病患者进行重组FVIIa(rFVIIa)临床药代动力学试验时的比较结果。体外数据表明,对于FVII:C检测,血浆样本的稀释并非呈平行关系。对于FVIIa活性检测,样本稀释与校准物的不同稀释度呈平行且线性关系。此外,发现FVIIa活性检测的批内变异比FVII:C检测的批内变异小。向正常血浆中添加不同量的rFVIIa(0 - 6微克/毫升)时,应用FVII:C检测观察到rFVIIa的平均比活性为48.6 U/微克;然而,比活性随rFVIIa水平的升高而降低。对于FVIIa活性检测,平均比活性为45.4 IU/微克。两种活性检测的直接比较表明,FVII:C和FVIIa活性测量之间无法进行简单转换。在两项临床试验中应用这两种检测方法进行药代动力学评估时,获得了曲线下面积、半衰期、清除率和分布容积的统计学显著不同估计值。总之,为评估rFVIIa的药代动力学特性,应使用FVIIa活性检测来测量活性——在两种可用的凝血因子VII活性检测方法中,这是一种更特异且可靠的检测方法,尤其是在评估低活性水平时。