Stone Jennifer S, Cotanche Douglas A
Virginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195-7923, USA.
Int J Dev Biol. 2007;51(6-7):633-47. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.072408js.
Regeneration of sensory hair cells in the mature avian inner ear was first described just over 20 years ago. Since then, it has been shown that many other non-mammalian species either continually produce new hair cells or regenerate them in response to trauma. However, mammals exhibit limited hair cell regeneration, particularly in the auditory epithelium. In birds and other non-mammals, regenerated hair cells arise from adjacent non-sensory (supporting) cells. Hair cell regeneration was initially described as a proliferative response whereby supporting cells re-enter the mitotic cycle, forming daughter cells that differentiate into either hair cells or supporting cells and thereby restore cytoarchitecture and function in the sensory epithelium. However, further analyses of the avian auditory epithelium (and amphibian vestibular epithelium) revealed a second regenerative mechanism, direct transdifferentiation, during which supporting cells change their gene expression and convert into hair cells without dividing. In the chicken auditory epithelium, these two distinct mechanisms show unique spatial and temporal patterns, suggesting they are differentially regulated. Current efforts are aimed at identifying signals that maintain supporting cells in a quiescent state or direct them to undergo direct transdifferentiation or cell division. Here, we review current knowledge about supporting cell properties and discuss candidate signaling molecules for regulating supporting cell behavior, in quiescence and after damage. While significant advances have been made in understanding regeneration in non-mammals over the last 20 years, we have yet to determine why the mammalian auditory epithelium lacks the ability to regenerate hair cells spontaneously and whether it is even capable of significant regeneration under additional circumstances. The continued study of mechanisms controlling regeneration in the avian auditory epithelium may lead to strategies for inducing significant and functional regeneration in mammals.
成熟鸟类内耳感觉毛细胞的再生最早是在20多年前被描述的。从那时起,研究表明许多其他非哺乳动物物种要么持续产生新的毛细胞,要么在受到创伤后再生毛细胞。然而,哺乳动物的毛细胞再生能力有限,尤其是在听觉上皮中。在鸟类和其他非哺乳动物中,再生的毛细胞源自相邻的非感觉(支持)细胞。毛细胞再生最初被描述为一种增殖反应,即支持细胞重新进入有丝分裂周期,形成分化为毛细胞或支持细胞的子细胞,从而恢复感觉上皮的细胞结构和功能。然而,对鸟类听觉上皮(和两栖动物前庭上皮)的进一步分析揭示了另一种再生机制,即直接转分化,在此过程中支持细胞改变其基因表达并在不分裂的情况下转化为毛细胞。在鸡的听觉上皮中,这两种不同的机制表现出独特的空间和时间模式,表明它们受到不同的调节。目前的研究工作旨在确定维持支持细胞处于静止状态或引导它们进行直接转分化或细胞分裂的信号。在这里,我们回顾了关于支持细胞特性的现有知识,并讨论了在静止和损伤后调节支持细胞行为的候选信号分子。虽然在过去20年中,我们在理解非哺乳动物的再生方面取得了重大进展,但我们尚未确定为什么哺乳动物的听觉上皮缺乏自发再生毛细胞的能力,以及在其他情况下它是否甚至能够进行显著的再生。对鸟类听觉上皮中控制再生机制的持续研究可能会带来在哺乳动物中诱导显著且功能性再生的策略。