• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文本的书面回忆和口头回忆是否等同?

Are written and spoken recall of text equivalent?

作者信息

Kellogg Ronald T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University, MO 63103-2097, USA.

出版信息

Am J Psychol. 2007 Fall;120(3):415-28.

PMID:17892086
Abstract

Writing is less practiced than speaking, graphemic codes are activated only in writing, and the retrieved representations of the text must be maintained in working memory longer because handwritten output is slower than speech. These extra demands on working memory could result in less effort being given to retrieval during written compared with spoken text recall. To test this hypothesis, college students read or heard Bartlett's "War of the Ghosts" and then recalled the text in writing or speech. Spoken recall produced more accurately recalled propositions and more major distortions (e.g., inferences) than written recall. The results suggest that writing reduces the retrieval effort given to reconstructing the propositions of a text.

摘要

书写的练习比口语少,字形编码仅在书写时被激活,而且由于手写输出比言语慢,文本的提取表征必须在工作记忆中保持更长时间。与口语相比,这些对工作记忆的额外要求可能导致在书面回忆文本时用于提取的精力减少。为了验证这一假设,大学生阅读或听了巴特利特的《幽灵的战争》,然后以书面或口头形式回忆文本。口头回忆比书面回忆产生了更准确回忆的命题和更多的主要歪曲(例如,推理)。结果表明,书写减少了用于重构文本命题的提取精力。

相似文献

1
Are written and spoken recall of text equivalent?文本的书面回忆和口头回忆是否等同?
Am J Psychol. 2007 Fall;120(3):415-28.
2
The importance of causal connections in the comprehension of spontaneous spoken discourse.因果联系在理解自然口语语篇中的重要性。
Psicothema. 2008 Nov;20(4):801-6.
3
Written vs. spoken eyewitness accounts: does modality of testing matter?书面与口头目击证词:测试方式是否重要?
Behav Sci Law. 2011 Nov-Dec;29(6):846-57. doi: 10.1002/bsl.1013. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
4
Relationship between orthographic-motor integration and computer use for the production of creative and well-structured written text.正字法-运动整合与使用计算机生成富有创意且结构良好的书面文本之间的关系。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2004 Dec;74(Pt 4):551-64. doi: 10.1348/0007099042376373.
5
The effect of written text on comprehension of spoken English as a foreign language.书面文本对作为外语的英语口语理解的影响。
Am J Psychol. 2007 Summer;120(2):237-61.
6
Influence of text type, topic familiarity, and stuttering frequency on listener recall, comprehension, and mental effort.文本类型、主题熟悉度和口吃频率对听众回忆、理解及心理努力的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Apr;52(2):534-46. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0238). Epub 2008 Dec 8.
7
To link, to infer, to understand.
Arch Psychol (Frankf). 1989;141(3):175-93.
8
Reduction and elimination of format effects on recall.减少并消除格式对记忆的影响。
Am J Psychol. 2008 Fall;121(3):377-94.
9
Subvocalization of heard or seen words prior to spoken or written recall.
Am J Psychol. 1972 Mar;85(1):63-8.
10
Written narratives of deaf and hearing students: story recall and inference.
J Speech Hear Res. 1985 Mar;28(1):151-9. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2801.151.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of response modality on witness statements when using the self-administered interview.使用自我管理式访谈时,反应方式对证人陈述的影响。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2024 Apr 7;32(3):337-353. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2024.2313977. eCollection 2025.
2
Deception and Cognitive Load: Expanding Our Horizon with a Working Memory Model.欺骗与认知负荷:运用工作记忆模型拓展我们的视野
Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 7;7:420. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00420. eCollection 2016.
3
Speaking is silver, writing is golden? The role of cognitive and social factors in written versus spoken witness accounts.
雄辩是银,写作是金?认知和社会因素在书面与口头证人陈述中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Aug;42(6):978-92. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0401-6.
4
Does response mode affect amount recalled or the magnitude of the testing effect?反应模式是否会影响回忆量或测试效应的大小?
Mem Cognit. 2013 Jan;41(1):36-48. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0245-x.