George R A, Smith T D, Callaghan S, Hardman L, Pierides C, Horaitis O, Wouters M A, Cotton R G H
Structural and Computational Biology Program, Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.
J Med Genet. 2008 Feb;45(2):65-70. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2007.052639. Epub 2007 Sep 24.
Databases of mutations causing Mendelian disease play a crucial role in research, diagnostic and genetic health care and can play a role in life and death decisions. These databases are thus heavily used, but only gene or locus specific databases have been previously reviewed for completeness, accuracy, currency and utility. We have performed a review of the various general mutation databases that derive their data from the published literature and locus specific databases. Only two--the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) and Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM)--had useful numbers of mutations. Comparison of a number of characteristics of these databases indicated substantial inconsistencies between the two databases that included absent genes and missing mutations. This situation strengthens the case for gene specific curation of mutations and the need for an overall plan for collection, curation, storage and release of mutation data.
导致孟德尔疾病的突变数据库在研究、诊断和遗传医疗保健中发挥着关键作用,并且可能在生死攸关的决策中发挥作用。因此,这些数据库被大量使用,但之前仅对基因或位点特异性数据库的完整性、准确性、时效性和实用性进行过综述。我们对各种从已发表文献中获取数据的通用突变数据库和位点特异性数据库进行了综述。只有两个数据库——人类基因突变数据库(HGMD)和《人类孟德尔遗传》(OMIM)——有数量可观的突变数据。对这些数据库的一些特征进行比较后发现,这两个数据库之间存在大量不一致之处,包括缺失的基因和遗漏的突变。这种情况进一步说明了对突变进行基因特异性整理的必要性,以及制定突变数据收集、整理、存储和发布总体计划的必要性。