Suppr超能文献

揭开临床轮转中“学习”的神秘面纱:沉浸式患者接触能否预测临床技能考试(CPX)的成绩?

Demystifying "learning" in clinical rotations: do immersive patient encounters predict achievement on the clinical performance examination (CPX)?

作者信息

Fung Cha-Chi, Relan Anju, Wilkerson LuAnn

机构信息

UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Dean's Office/Ed&R, 60-051 CHS, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1722, USA.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2007 Oct;82(10 Suppl):S97-S100. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31813ffd3a.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the Liaison Committee on Medical Education required U.S. medical schools to quantify students' clinical encounters, optimum patient exposure needed to predict performance has been elusive. This study explored the relationship between comprehensive patient encounters logged on personal digital assistants (PDAs) during three medicine clerkships, to performance on a clinical performance examination (CPX).

METHOD

PDA log data for 166 medical students were used to identify educationally "rich" patient encounters, where students were assigned full responsibility for patient care.

RESULTS

Univariate regression analyses predicting the effect of immersive patient encounters on CPX case scores did not show statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Amount of patient exposure defined by the richness of student-patient interaction did not reflect on the CPX performance for six selected cases. Further research should examine qualitatively different learning experiences occurring with patient encounters and a higher volume of exposure to predict outcomes.

摘要

背景

尽管医学教育联络委员会要求美国医学院校量化学生的临床接触经历,但预测表现所需的最佳患者接触量一直难以确定。本研究探讨了在三个内科实习期间个人数字助理(PDA)记录的全面患者接触与临床技能考核(CPX)表现之间的关系。

方法

使用166名医学生的PDA日志数据来识别具有教育意义的“丰富”患者接触经历,即学生被赋予对患者护理的全部责任。

结果

预测沉浸式患者接触对CPX病例分数影响的单变量回归分析未显示出统计学意义。

结论

由学生与患者互动丰富程度所定义的患者接触量并未反映所选六个病例的CPX表现。进一步的研究应定性地考察患者接触过程中出现的不同学习经历以及更高接触量对预测结果的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验