Suppr超能文献

凝血酶生成试验和粘弹性凝血监测仪显示,普通肝素和比伐卢定在凝血酶抑制模式上存在差异。

Thrombin generation assay and viscoelastic coagulation monitors demonstrate differences in the mode of thrombin inhibition between unfractionated heparin and bivalirudin.

作者信息

Tanaka Kenichi A, Szlam Fania, Sun He Ying, Taketomi Taro, Levy Jerrold H

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. USA.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2007 Oct;105(4):933-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000278868.23814.3b.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coagulation tests, such as activated partial thromboplastin time and activated clotting time, are used to monitor the effects of unfractionated heparin and the direct thrombin inhibitor, bivalirudin. These tests reflect only the initial phase of blood clotting, when <5% of thrombin has been formed. In this study, we sought to determine if similar increases in activated partial thromboplastin time or activated clotting time due to heparin or bivalirudin would reflect the same degree of inhibition of thrombin formation.

METHODS

Thrombin formation was evaluated in platelet-poor plasma activated in the presence of heparin (0-5 U/mL) or bivalirudin (0-30 microg/mL) using a thrombin generation assay (Thrombinoscope). Prothrombin activation was measured by prothrombin fragment 1.2 (F1.2) formation. Thrombus formation was further evaluated in kaolin-activated whole blood samples containing heparin (1.5 or 2.5 U/mL) or bivalirudin (12.5 or 25 microg/mL) using Sonoclot and thromboelastography.

RESULTS

Based on the Thrombinoscope results, increasing concentrations of bivalirudin and heparin progressively delayed the onset of thrombin formation, but only heparin dose-dependently decreased the amount of thrombin generated. Heparin and bivalirudin delayed the onset of F1.2 formation, but there was no difference in peak F1.2 levels between bivalirudin and non-anticoagulated samples (206 +/- 28.2 vs 182 +/- 23.9 nmol/L, P = 0.09). In heparinized samples, F1.2 levels were significantly lower (75.7 +/- 29.8 nmol/L, P < 0.05) than controls. Heparin and bivalirudin prolonged the onset of clotting on viscoelastic monitors, but only heparin decreased the rate of thrombus formation.

CONCLUSION

Thrombus formation kinetics differs between heparin and bivalirudin despite similar prolongation of clotting test values.

摘要

背景

凝血试验,如活化部分凝血活酶时间和活化凝血时间,用于监测普通肝素和直接凝血酶抑制剂比伐卢定的效果。这些试验仅反映凝血的初始阶段,此时凝血酶形成量不足5%。在本研究中,我们试图确定因肝素或比伐卢定导致的活化部分凝血活酶时间或活化凝血时间的类似增加是否反映相同程度的凝血酶形成抑制。

方法

使用凝血酶生成试验(凝血酶监测仪)在存在肝素(0 - 5 U/mL)或比伐卢定(0 - 30 μg/mL)的情况下对乏血小板血浆中的凝血酶形成进行评估。通过凝血酶原片段1.2(F1.2)的形成来测量凝血酶原激活。使用Sonoclot和血栓弹力图在含有肝素(1.5或2.5 U/mL)或比伐卢定(12.5或25 μg/mL)的高岭土活化全血样本中进一步评估血栓形成。

结果

基于凝血酶监测仪的结果,比伐卢定和肝素浓度增加逐渐延迟凝血酶形成的起始,但只有肝素剂量依赖性地减少生成的凝血酶量。肝素和比伐卢定延迟F1.2形成的起始,但比伐卢定样本与未抗凝样本之间的F1.2峰值水平无差异(206 ± 28.2对182 ± 23.9 nmol/L,P = 0.09)。在肝素化样本中,F1.2水平显著低于对照组(75.7 ± 29.8 nmol/L,P < 0.05)。肝素和比伐卢定延长了粘弹性监测仪上的凝血起始时间,但只有肝素降低了血栓形成速率。

结论

尽管凝血试验值延长相似,但肝素和比伐卢定的血栓形成动力学不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验