Suppr超能文献

The Narcotrend monitor and the electroencephalogram in propofol-induced sedation.

作者信息

Doenicke Alfred W, Kugler Johann, Kochs Eberhard, Rau Jeus, Mückter Haraed, Hoernecke Rainer, Conzen Peter, Bromber Harry, Schneider Gerhard

机构信息

Institute for Anesthesiology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2007 Oct;105(4):982-92, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000281145.46541.de.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Narcotrend (NCT) is a one-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) monitor of the level of sedation. It is based on a visual EEG scoring system, which was developed by Loomis and modified by Kugler, to yield a visual expert classification (VEC) scheme for differentiation of six levels of sedation (A-F), which are subdivided into 16 substages. We designed the present study to test whether results of the automated classification of one-channel NCT input reflect those from VEC of five-channel EEG.

METHODS

Twelve healthy male volunteers received propofol using two different infusion regimens in a randomized, crossover design with concomitant NCT monitoring and VEC. Scoring results of NCT were compared with those of VEC.

RESULTS

During the infusion period, score differences of more than three substages were observed in 14 of 24 (= 58%) propofol administrations (4%-7% of total data). Often, the NCT indicated lighter sedation than VEC, which revealed more delta activity from nonfrontal leads. During recovery, NCT reported deeper sedation than VEC in 6 of 24 (= 25%) propofol administrations. Discordant trends (periods of at least five subsequent epochs with monotonic, but opposite trends for both NCT and VEC) were noted in 9 of 24 propofol administrations (37%). Furthermore, NCT had several periods when no staging information was displayed, varying from a few seconds to 10 min.

CONCLUSIONS

As the algorithm of NCT is proprietary and not accessible to the public, reasons for the observed differences between NCT and VEC cannot be analyzed and explanations must remain speculative.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验