Yoder K M, Maupome G, Ofner S, Swigonski N L
Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
J Public Health Dent. 2007 Summer;67(3):140-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2007.00037.x.
This study assessed the knowledge of Indiana dentists and dental hygienists about fluoride's predominant mode of action and their protocols for the use of fluoride for dental caries prevention.
In 2000, questionnaires were mailed to 6,681 Indiana dentists and hygienists prior to the 2001 release of recommendations for the use of fluoride by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2005, the questionnaires were again sent to Indiana dental professionals to assess changes in knowledge and protocols. In addition, a 10 percent sample of Illinois dentists and hygienists were surveyed to determine the similarity of Indiana and Illinois responses.
Questionnaires were anonymously completed and returned. In 2000, a minority of Indiana health professionals (17 percent) correctly identified that remineralization was fluoride's predominant mode of action. There was a significant increase in Indiana respondents correctly identifying this predominant mode of action between 2000 and 2005 (17 percent versus 25 percent, respectively, P < 0.0001). Fourteen percent of Illinois respondents answered correctly in 2005. Preeruptive incorporation of fluoride into enamel was the most frequently cited incorrect response (IN 2000, 79 percent; IN 2005, 71 percent; IL 2005, 82 percent). Some protocols for use of fluoride products reflected inadequate understanding of fluoride's predominant posteruptive mode of action.
The majority of dental professionals surveyed were unaware of the current understanding of fluoride's predominant posteruptive mode of action through remineralization of incipient carious lesions. Additional research is indicated to assess fluoride knowledge and protocols of dental professionals nationwide. Educational efforts are needed to promote the appropriate use of fluoride.
本研究评估了印第安纳州牙医和口腔卫生员关于氟化物主要作用方式的知识,以及他们使用氟化物预防龋齿的方案。
2000年,在美国疾病控制与预防中心发布氟化物使用建议之前,向6681名印第安纳州牙医和口腔卫生员邮寄了调查问卷。2005年,再次向印第安纳州的牙科专业人员发送调查问卷,以评估知识和方案的变化。此外,对10%的伊利诺伊州牙医和口腔卫生员进行了调查,以确定印第安纳州和伊利诺伊州的回答是否相似。
调查问卷均被匿名填写并返回。2000年,少数印第安纳州的卫生专业人员(17%)正确识别出再矿化是氟化物的主要作用方式。在2000年至2005年期间,正确识别这种主要作用方式的印第安纳州受访者显著增加(分别为17%和25%,P<0.0001)。2005年,14%的伊利诺伊州受访者回答正确。氟化物在牙釉质萌出前的掺入是最常被提及的错误答案(2000年印第安纳州为79%;2005年印第安纳州为71%;2005年伊利诺伊州为82%)。一些氟化物产品的使用方案反映出对氟化物主要的萌出后作用方式理解不足。
大多数接受调查的牙科专业人员并不了解目前关于氟化物通过早期龋损再矿化的主要萌出后作用方式的认识。需要进行更多研究来评估全国牙科专业人员的氟化物知识和方案。需要开展教育工作以促进氟化物的合理使用。