Genden Eric M, Ferlito Alfio, Rinaldo Alessandra, Silver Carl E, Fagan Johannes J, Suárez Carlos, Langendijk Johannes A, Lefebvre Jean Louis, Bradley Patrick J, Leemans C René, Chen Amy Y, Jose Jemy, Wolf Gregory T
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Head Neck. 2008 Jan;30(1):103-10. doi: 10.1002/hed.20715.
Since the original data from the Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group demonstrated that nonsurgical therapy could achieve survival rates comparable to total laryngectomy in selected cases, there has been a progressive increase in employment of nonsurgical therapy for the management of advanced laryngeal cancer. Both neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conventionally fractionated or hyperfractioned radiotherapy for chemotherapy responders, or simultaneously administered chemoradiation has resulted in a significant number of patients who achieved cure while preserving their larynges. Nevertheless, combined chemotherapy and external beam radiation is associated with a variety of acute and chronic sequelae that can have a debilitating impact on function and quality of life. Although no therapeutic option is without risk, the decision regarding the modality of therapy for a patient with advanced laryngeal cancer should prompt a careful review of the current surgical techniques available for treatment. Data on quality of life and aging, as well as advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques, are available today that were not available at the time of the Veterans study. Selection of optimal therapy is often complex and raises the question whether the pendulum may have swung too far in the direction of nonsurgical therapy for advanced laryngeal cancer. This article reviews the current options available for a patient with advanced laryngeal cancer and discusses the impact of therapy.
美国退伍军人事务部喉癌研究小组的原始数据表明,在某些特定病例中,非手术治疗能够取得与全喉切除术相当的生存率,自此,非手术治疗在晚期喉癌管理中的应用逐渐增多。对于化疗有反应者,先进行新辅助化疗,然后进行常规分割或超分割放疗,或者同时进行放化疗,已经使相当数量的患者在保留喉部的情况下实现了治愈。然而,联合化疗和外照射放疗会引发各种急慢性后遗症,这些后遗症可能会对功能和生活质量产生不利影响。虽然没有哪种治疗方法毫无风险,但对于晚期喉癌患者的治疗方式决策,应该促使我们仔细审视当前可用的手术治疗技术。如今已有关于生活质量和衰老的数据,以及微创外科技术的进展,而这些在退伍军人研究时并不存在。选择最佳治疗方案往往很复杂,这也引发了一个问题,即对于晚期喉癌的非手术治疗,其趋势是否可能已经过度偏向。本文回顾了晚期喉癌患者当前可用的治疗选择,并讨论了治疗的影响。