Morimoto Tsuyoshi, Tateishi Ukihide, Maeda Tetsuo, Arai Yasuaki, Nakajima Yasuo, Edmund Kim E
Division of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Eur J Radiol. 2008 Sep;67(3):508-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.08.017. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of integrated contrast-enhanced positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT), as compared with non-contrasted PET/CT, in evaluating nodal status of malignant lymphoma in pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphatic pathways.
Sixty-six patients (33 men and 33 women) with malignant lymphoma underwent staging with integrated CT and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)FDG) PET. Tumor types were diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=26, 39%), follicular lymphoma (n=20, 30%), Hodgkin disease (n=16, 24%), and marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (n=4, 6%). Both non-contrasted PET/CT and contrast-enhanced PET/CT images were examined separately by two different qualified physicians for each imaging modality, and nodal status of pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphatic pathways was evaluated. Reference standard included follow-up with clinical, laboratory, and conventional CT findings. We compared diagnostic accuracy retrospectively on basis of per-patient and per-lesion analyses between two modalities using McNemar test, respectively.
Nodal status of pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphatic pathways was more accurately determined on contrast-enhanced PET/CT (n=52, 79%) compared with non-contrasted PET/CT (n=47, 71%). Difference in the accuracy of nodal staging between non-contrasted PET/CT and contrast-enhanced PET/CT was significant (p=0.048). On basis of per-lesion analysis, contrast-enhanced PET/CT determined more accurately the status of external iliac lymph node (p=0.002), internal iliac lymph node (p<0.0001), and common iliac lymph node (p=0.002) compared with non-contrasted PET/CT. Diagnostic accuracies of paraaortic lymph node, aortocaval lymph node, and paracaval lymph node were similar by either non-contrasted PET/CT or contrast-enhanced PET/CT.
Integrated contrast-enhanced PET/CT improves the diagnostic accuracy in evaluating nodal status of pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphatic pathways in patients with malignant lymphoma.
与非增强型正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/计算机断层扫描(CT)相比,确定综合对比增强正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和计算机断层扫描(CT)在评估盆腔和腹膜后淋巴途径恶性淋巴瘤淋巴结状态方面的诊断准确性。
66例恶性淋巴瘤患者(33例男性和33例女性)接受了CT和氟-18-氟脱氧葡萄糖((18)FDG)PET综合分期。肿瘤类型包括弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(n = 26,39%)、滤泡性淋巴瘤(n = 20,30%)、霍奇金病(n = 16,24%)和边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤(n = 4,6%)。对于每种成像方式,由两名不同资质的医生分别单独检查非增强型PET/CT和对比增强型PET/CT图像,并评估盆腔和腹膜后淋巴途径的淋巴结状态。参考标准包括临床、实验室和传统CT检查结果的随访。我们分别使用McNemar检验,基于每位患者和每个病灶的分析,回顾性比较两种方式之间的诊断准确性。
与非增强型PET/CT(n = 47,71%)相比,对比增强型PET/CT(n = 52,79%)能更准确地确定盆腔和腹膜后淋巴途径的淋巴结状态。非增强型PET/CT和对比增强型PET/CT在淋巴结分期准确性上的差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.048)。基于每个病灶的分析,与非增强型PET/CT相比,对比增强型PET/CT能更准确地确定髂外淋巴结(p = 0.002)、髂内淋巴结(p < 0.0001)和髂总淋巴结(p = 0.002)的状态。非增强型PET/CT或对比增强型PET/CT对腹主动脉旁淋巴结、主动脉腔静脉间淋巴结和腔静脉旁淋巴结的诊断准确性相似。
综合对比增强型PET/CT提高了评估恶性淋巴瘤患者盆腔和腹膜后淋巴途径淋巴结状态的诊断准确性。