Bello M A, Hawkins J A, Rudall P J
School of Biological Sciences, Plant Sciences Laboratories, The University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire RG1 6AS, UK.
Ann Bot. 2007 Dec;100(7):1491-505. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm228. Epub 2007 Sep 29.
Molecular phylogenies have suggested a new circumscription for Fabales to include Leguminosae, Quillajaceae, Surianaceae and Polygalaceae. However, recent attempts to reconstruct the interfamilial relationships of the order have resulted in several alternative hypotheses, including a sister relationship between Quillajaceae and Surianaceae, the two species-poor families of Fabales. Here, floral morphology and ontogeny of these two families are investigated to explore evidence of a potential relationship between them. Floral traits are discussed with respect to early radiation in the order.
Floral buds of representatives of Quillajaceae and Surianaceae were dissected and observed using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy.
Quillajaceae and Surianaceae possess some common traits, such as inflorescence morphology and perianth initiation, but development and organization of their reproductive whorls differ. In Quillaja, initiation of the diplostemonous androecium is unidirectional, overlapping with the petal primordia. In contrast, Suriana is obdiplostemonous, and floral organ initiation is simultaneous. Independent initiation of five carpels is common to both Quillaja and Suriana, but subsequent development differs; the antesepalous carpels of Quillaja become fused proximally and exhibit two rows of ovules, and in Suriana the gynoecium is apocarpous, gynobasic, with antepetalous biovulate carpels.
Differences in the reproductive development and organization of Quillajaceae and Surianaceae cast doubt on their potential sister relationship. Instead, Quillaja resembles Leguminosae in some floral traits, a hypothesis not suggested by molecular-based phylogenies. Despite implicit associations of zygomorphy with species-rich clades and actinomorphy with species-poor families in Fabales, this correlation sometimes fails due to high variation in floral symmetry. Studies considering specific derived clades and reproductive biology could address more precise hypotheses of key innovation and differential diversification in the order.
分子系统发育研究表明,豆目有了新的界定,包括豆科、皂树科、海人树科和远志科。然而,最近重建该目科间关系的尝试产生了几种不同的假说,其中包括皂树科和海人树科这两个物种较少的科之间的姐妹关系。在此,对这两个科的花形态和个体发育进行研究,以探寻它们之间潜在关系的证据。针对该目早期辐射,对花的特征进行了讨论。
利用光学显微镜和扫描电子显微镜对皂树科和海人树科代表植物的花芽进行解剖和观察。
皂树科和海人树科具有一些共同特征,如花序形态和花被起始,但它们生殖轮的发育和结构不同。在皂树属中,二体雄蕊的起始是单向的,与花瓣原基重叠。相比之下,海人树属是异二体雄蕊,花器官起始是同时的。皂树属和海人树属的五个心皮都是独立起始的,但随后的发育不同;皂树属的萼下位子房心皮在基部融合,有两排胚珠,而在海人树属中,雌蕊群是离生心皮的,雌蕊基生,有花瓣下双胚珠的心皮。
皂树科和海人树科在生殖发育和结构上的差异,让人对它们潜在的姐妹关系产生怀疑。相反地,皂树属在一些花的特征上与豆科相似,这是基于分子系统发育研究未提出的假说。尽管在豆目中,两侧对称与物种丰富的类群以及辐射对称与物种较少的科之间存在隐含联系,但由于花对称性的高度变异性,这种相关性有时并不成立。考虑特定衍生类群和生殖生物学的研究,可能会解决该目中关键创新和差异多样化的更精确假说。