Bello M Angélica, Rudall Paula J, Hawkins Julie A
School of Biological Sciences, Lyle Tower, the University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire RG6 6BX, UK.
Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK.
Cladistics. 2012 Aug;28(4):393-421. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2012.00392.x. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
Relationships between the four families placed in the angiosperm order Fabales (Leguminosae, Polygalaceae, Quillajaceae, Surianaceae) were hitherto poorly resolved. We combine published molecular data for the chloroplast regions matK and rbcL with 66 morphological characters surveyed for 73 ingroup and two outgroup species, and use Parsimony and Bayesian approaches to explore matrices with different missing data. All combined analyses using Parsimony recovered the topology Polygalaceae (Leguminosae (Quillajaceae + Surianaceae)). Bayesian analyses with matched morphological and molecular sampling recover the same topology, but analyses based on other data recover a different Bayesian topology: ((Polygalaceae + Leguminosae) (Quillajaceae + Surianaceae)). We explore the evolution of floral characters in the context of the more consistent topology: Polygalaceae (Leguminosae (Quillajaceae + Surianaceae)). This reveals synapomorphies for (Leguminosae (Quillajaceae + Surianaceae)) as the presence of free filaments and marginal/ventral placentation, for (Quillajaceae + Surianaceae) as pentamery and apocarpy, and for Leguminosae the presence of an abaxial median sepal and unicarpellate gynoecium. An octamerous androecium is synapomorphic for Polygalaceae. The development of papilionate flowers, and the evolutionary context in which these phenotypes appeared in Leguminosae and Polygalaceae, shows that the morphologies are convergent rather than synapomorphic within Fabales.
被子植物豆目(豆科、远志科、皂树科、海人树科)中四个科之间的关系迄今尚未得到很好的解决。我们将已发表的叶绿体区域matK和rbcL的分子数据与针对73个类群和两个外类群物种调查的66个形态特征相结合,并使用简约法和贝叶斯方法来探索具有不同缺失数据的矩阵。所有使用简约法的联合分析都得到了远志科(豆科(皂树科 + 海人树科))的拓扑结构。形态学和分子抽样匹配的贝叶斯分析得到了相同的拓扑结构,但基于其他数据的分析得到了不同的贝叶斯拓扑结构:((远志科 + 豆科)(皂树科 + 海人树科))。我们在更一致的拓扑结构:远志科(豆科(皂树科 + 海人树科))的背景下探索花部特征的进化。这揭示了(豆科(皂树科 + 海人树科))的共有衍征为花丝离生和边缘/腹侧胎座,(皂树科 + 海人树科)的共有衍征为花部五基数和心皮离生,豆科的共有衍征为具背侧中萼片和单心皮雌蕊群。八基数雄蕊是远志科的共有衍征。蝶形花的发育以及这些表型在豆科和远志科中出现的进化背景表明,这些形态在豆目中是趋同的而非共有衍征。