Tao Yungan, Lefkopoulos Dimitri, Ibrahima Diallo, Bridier Andre, Polizzi Maria Del Pilar, Wibault Pierre, De Crevoisier Renaud, Arriagada Rodrigo, Bourhis Jean
Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Acta Oncol. 2008;47(3):442-50. doi: 10.1080/02841860701666055. Epub 2007 Sep 28.
High-energy external radiotherapy has become one of the most common treatment in localized prostate cancer. We compared the difference of dose distribution, mainly at the 5-30 Gy dose level, in the irradiated pelvic volume among three modalities of radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer: conventional, conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). We selected six patients with prostate cancer treated by conformal radiotherapy at the doses of 46 Gy to PTVN (prostate and seminal vesicles), and 70 Gy to PTV-T (prostate). The conventional technique": an 8-field arrangement was used; the conformal technique 4 fields with a boost through 6 fields. For IMRT, a five-beam arrangement was used. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) were analyzed and compared among the three techniques. The IMRT technique significantly increased the pelvic volume covered by the isodose surfaces below 15 Gy as compared with the conventional and conformal techniques. The mean absolute increase for the pelvic volume included between 5-30 Gy for the IMRT technique, was about 2 900 ml as compared with the conventional technique. However, IMRT significantly reduced the irradiated volume of the rectum in the dose range of 5 to 40 Gy, also significantly reduced the irradiated volume of bladder and femoral heads, and obtained a similar or improved isodose distribution in the PTVs. In addition, the use of IMRT slightly increased the relative dose delivered to the body volume outside the pelvis, as estimated by the use of specific software. A long-term follow-up will be needed to evaluate potential late treatment complications related to the use of IMRT and the low or moderate irradiation dose level obtained in the pelvis and in the whole body.
高能外照射放疗已成为局限性前列腺癌最常见的治疗方法之一。我们比较了前列腺癌患者三种放疗方式(传统放疗、适形放疗和调强放疗[IMRT])在盆腔照射体积中剂量分布的差异,主要是在5 - 30 Gy剂量水平。我们选择了6例接受适形放疗的前列腺癌患者,前列腺和精囊(PTVN)的剂量为46 Gy,前列腺(PTV - T)的剂量为70 Gy。传统技术采用8野照射;适形技术为4野照射并通过6野进行增敏。对于IMRT,采用五束照射。分析并比较了三种技术的剂量体积直方图(DVH)。与传统放疗和适形放疗技术相比,IMRT技术显著增加了15 Gy以下等剂量面覆盖的盆腔体积。与传统技术相比,IMRT技术在5 - 30 Gy范围内盆腔体积的平均绝对增加量约为2900 ml。然而,IMRT在5至40 Gy剂量范围内显著减少了直肠的受照体积,也显著减少了膀胱和股骨头的受照体积,并在计划靶体积(PTV)中获得了相似或更好的等剂量分布。此外,通过特定软件估计,IMRT的使用略微增加了盆腔外身体体积所接受的相对剂量。需要进行长期随访,以评估与IMRT使用相关以及盆腔和全身获得的低或中等照射剂量水平相关的潜在晚期治疗并发症。