Fogari Roberto, Mugellini Amedeo, Derosa Giuseppe
Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Centro per l'Ipertensione e la Fisiopatologia Cardiovascolare, University of Pavia, Pavia.
J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2007 Sep;8(3):139-44. doi: 10.3317/jraas.2007.023.
The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with candesartan cilexetil, 16 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide (CC/HCTZ), 12.5 mg was compared with that of amlodipine, in a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension inadequately controlled by monotherapy. After a two week run-in period on existing therapy, patients with a sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 90-110 mmHg and a sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) <or= 180 mmHg were switched to either CC/HCTZ (n=101) or amlodipine (n=102), once-daily by mouth. After eight weeks of treatment, both regimens reduced mean trough blood pressure (BP) by a similar amount: mean sitting SBP/DBP reductions were -15.4/-11.9 mmHg for CC/HCTZ, and -15.7/-12.0 mmHg for amlodipine (group differences, p=0.835/0.963). The BP of 84.2% of patients on CC/HCTZ and 84.5% on amlodipine was controlled (sitting DBP < 90 mmHg and sitting SBP < 140 mmHg) (p=1.00). Six (5.9%) patients on CC/HCTZ and 18 (17.6%) on amlodipine discontinued treatment, including one (1%) and 13 (12.7%) owing to adverse events (p<0.001). The most common adverse event was peripheral oedema, which occurred in two patients on CC/HCTZ and 19 on amlodipine. In conclusion, CC/HCTZ and amlodipine were equally effective in reducing BP in hypertensive patients not controlled by monotherapy, but CC/HCTZ was much better tolerated. Tolerance is an important clinical consideration in the chronic treatment of an asymptomatic disease.
在一项针对轻度至中度原发性高血压患者的多中心、双盲、随机、平行组研究中,比较了坎地沙坦酯(16毫克)加氢氯噻嗪(12.5毫克)(CC/HCTZ)联合治疗与氨氯地平的降压疗效和耐受性。这些患者接受单药治疗时血压控制不佳。在现有治疗的两周导入期后,坐位舒张压(DBP)为90 - 110 mmHg且坐位收缩压(SBP)≤180 mmHg的患者被随机分为两组,分别改为口服CC/HCTZ(n = 101)或氨氯地平(n = 102),每日一次。治疗八周后,两种治疗方案降低平均谷血压(BP)的幅度相似:CC/HCTZ组坐位SBP/DBP平均降低-15.4 / -11.9 mmHg,氨氯地平组为-15.7 / -12.0 mmHg(组间差异,p = 0.835 / 0.963)。CC/HCTZ组84.2%的患者和氨氯地平组84.5%的患者血压得到控制(坐位DBP < 90 mmHg且坐位SBP < 140 mmHg)(p = 1.00)。CC/HCTZ组有6例(5.9%)患者和氨氯地平组有18例(17.6%)患者停止治疗,其中CC/HCTZ组有1例(1%)、氨氯地平组有13例(12.7%)因不良事件停药(p < 0.001)。最常见的不良事件是外周水肿,CC/HCTZ组有2例患者出现,氨氯地平组有19例患者出现。总之,CC/HCTZ和氨氯地平在降低未接受单药治疗控制的高血压患者血压方面同样有效,但CC/HCTZ的耐受性要好得多。在无症状疾病的长期治疗中,耐受性是一个重要的临床考虑因素。