CRF01_AE(E亚型)候选疫苗安全性和免疫原性的1/2期比较疫苗试验:用ALVAC-HIV(vCP1521)初免,并用寡聚gp160(92TH023/LAI-DID)或二价gp120(CM235/SF2)加强免疫。
A phase 1/2 comparative vaccine trial of the safety and immunogenicity of a CRF01_AE (subtype E) candidate vaccine: ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) prime with oligomeric gp160 (92TH023/LAI-DID) or bivalent gp120 (CM235/SF2) boost.
作者信息
Thongcharoen Prasert, Suriyanon Vinai, Paris Robert M, Khamboonruang Chirasak, de Souza Mark S, Ratto-Kim Silvia, Karnasuta Chitraporn, Polonis Victoria R, Baglyos Lynn, Habib Raphaelle El, Gurunathan Sanjay, Barnett Susan, Brown Arthur E, Birx Deborah L, McNeil John G, Kim Jerome H
机构信息
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
出版信息
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007 Sep 1;46(1):48-55. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181354bd7.
BACKGROUND
The development of an effective HIV-1 vaccine is critical to control the pandemic. A prime-boost HIV-1 vaccine trial assessing safety and immunogenicity was conducted in Thailand as part of an evaluation of candidate regimens for a phase 3 efficacy trial.
METHODS
ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521), expressing circulating recombinant form 01_AE (CRF01_AE) gp120/subtype B LAI and subtype B Gag/Protease boosted with recombinant envelope oligomeric CRF01_AE gp160 (ogp160) or bivalent CRF01_AE/subtype B gp120 CM235/SF2, was evaluated in a phase 1/II trial of 130 HIV-negative Thai adults.
RESULTS
One hundred forty volunteers were enrolled, and 130 completed all safety and immunogenicity visits. Reactogenicity was common but generally mild, and there was no significant difference in the adverse event rate between vaccine and placebo recipients (P = 0.26). There were 7 serious adverse events during the follow-up period, none of which were vaccine related. Cumulative HIV-specific, CD8-mediated, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses were observed in 11 (25%) of 44 subjects who received ALVAC boosted by bivalent gp120 and in 5 (11%) of 45 subjects who received ALVAC boosted by ogp160, but these differences were not statistically significant compared with those in placebo recipients (P = 0.62 and P = 0.37, respectively). HIV-specific lymphoproliferative responses were detected in 84% of subunit-boosted vaccine recipients and in 10% of placebo recipients. Neutralizing antibody responses to CRF01_AE and subtype B laboratory strains were seen in 95% of ogp160-boosted and 100% of gp120 B/E-boosted vaccinees, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
These 2 different prime-boost regimens seem to be safe and displayed cell-mediated immune responses consistent with those in other trials of canarypox vectors.
背景
开发一种有效的HIV-1疫苗对于控制这一全球性流行病至关重要。作为3期疗效试验候选方案评估的一部分,在泰国进行了一项评估安全性和免疫原性的初免-加强HIV-1疫苗试验。
方法
在130名HIV阴性的泰国成年人中进行的1/II期试验中,评估了表达循环重组形式01_AE(CRF01_AE)gp120/ B亚型LAI以及B亚型Gag/蛋白酶,并分别用重组包膜寡聚体CRF01_AE gp160(ogp160)或二价CRF01_AE/B亚型gp120 CM235/SF2加强免疫的ALVAC-HIV(vCP1521)。
结果
招募了140名志愿者,130名完成了所有安全性和免疫原性访视。反应原性常见但一般较轻,疫苗接种者和安慰剂接受者之间的不良事件发生率无显著差异(P = 0.26)。随访期间有7起严重不良事件,均与疫苗无关。在接受二价gp120加强免疫的44名受试者中的11名(25%)以及接受ogp160加强免疫的45名受试者中的5名(11%)中观察到了累积的HIV特异性、CD8介导的细胞毒性T淋巴细胞反应,但与安慰剂接受者相比,这些差异无统计学意义(分别为P = 0.62和P = 0.37)。在84%的亚单位加强疫苗接种者和10%的安慰剂接受者中检测到HIV特异性淋巴细胞增殖反应。分别在95%接受ogp160加强免疫和100%接受gp120 B/E加强免疫的疫苗接种者中观察到对CRF01_AE和B亚型实验室毒株的中和抗体反应。
结论
这两种不同的初免-加强方案似乎是安全的,并显示出与其他金丝雀痘病毒载体试验一致的细胞介导免疫反应。