• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨学科共同决策:将共同治理提升到新高度。

Interdisciplinary shared decision-making: taking shared governance to the next level.

作者信息

Golanowski Marie, Beaudry Diane, Kurz Lynne, Laffey William J, Hook Mary L

机构信息

Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Adm Q. 2007 Oct-Dec;31(4):341-53. doi: 10.1097/01.NAQ.0000290431.72184.5a.

DOI:10.1097/01.NAQ.0000290431.72184.5a
PMID:17909433
Abstract

Healthcare organizations have been challenged to make high-quality, safe, and reliable care more affordable, portable, transparent, and efficient. Skillful leadership and contributions from all members of the organization are needed to accomplish these changes. This article describes how one organization, driven by a vision for finding better ways, embarked on a journey to design, implement, and refine their model for interdisciplinary shared decision-making (SDM). The model was based on the principles of accountability, equity, ownership, and partnership, and designed to support staff members in right decision-making at the point of service. The success of SDM depends on leaders who believe in the process and demonstrate their commitment by holding front-line managers accountable for allocating resources and coaching staff. Point-of-service staff, in turn, must accept ownership and accountability for the content of their work and be willing to develop their SDM knowledge, comfort, and skills over time. Preliminary outcomes indicate that these new processes have had a positive effect in helping the organization find better ways to innovate and improve patient care.

摘要

医疗保健机构面临着挑战,需要使高质量、安全且可靠的护理变得更经济实惠、便于携带、透明且高效。要实现这些变革,需要组织全体成员具备娴熟的领导能力并做出贡献。本文描述了一个组织如何在寻求更好方法的愿景驱动下,踏上设计、实施和完善其跨学科共享决策(SDM)模式的征程。该模式基于问责制、公平、自主权和伙伴关系原则,旨在支持工作人员在服务点做出正确决策。SDM的成功取决于那些相信这一过程并通过要求一线管理人员对资源分配和员工指导负责来展现其承诺的领导者。反过来,服务点的工作人员必须对其工作内容承担自主权和问责制,并愿意随着时间的推移提升他们的SDM知识、舒适度和技能。初步结果表明,这些新流程在帮助该组织找到更好的创新和改善患者护理的方法方面产生了积极影响。

相似文献

1
Interdisciplinary shared decision-making: taking shared governance to the next level.跨学科共同决策:将共同治理提升到新高度。
Nurs Adm Q. 2007 Oct-Dec;31(4):341-53. doi: 10.1097/01.NAQ.0000290431.72184.5a.
2
Strategies and tools for managing change.管理变革的策略与工具。
J Nurs Adm. 2007 Sep;37(9):405-13. doi: 10.1097/01.NNA.0000285138.34247.5b.
3
Developing leaders at every level: accountability and empowerment actualized through shared governance.培养各级领导者:通过共同治理实现问责制与赋权。
J Nurs Adm. 2007 Dec;37(12):564-8. doi: 10.1097/01.NNA.0000302386.76119.22.
4
Measuring change: a key component of building a culture of safety.衡量变化:构建安全文化的关键要素。
Nurs Econ. 2007 Jan-Feb;25(1):49-51.
5
Leading and empowering the multicultural work team.领导并赋能多元文化工作团队。
Semin Nurse Manag. 2002 Sep;10(3):164-70.
6
Shared governance: making the transition in practice and perception.共享治理:实现实践与认知的转变。
J Nurs Adm. 2007 Apr;37(4):177-83. doi: 10.1097/01.NNA.0000266847.84802.ea.
7
Transforming care at Mass General.麻省总医院的护理转型。
Am J Nurs. 2008 Sep;108(9):71-2. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000334978.12855.59.
8
Nursing peer review: integrating a model in a shared governance environment.护理同行评审:在共享治理环境中整合模型。
J Nurs Adm. 2009 Dec;39(12):524-30. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181c18053.
9
Team behavioral norms: a shared vision for a healthy patient care workplace.团队行为规范:对健康的患者护理工作场所的共同愿景。
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2007 Jul-Sep;30(3):213-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CNQ.0000278921.14197.f9.
10
Process leadership and the death of management.流程领导力与管理的消亡。
Nurs Econ. 1997 Nov-Dec;15(6):286-93.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of nursing shared governance educational program on nurse managers' knowledge for sustainable nursing excellence and empowerment.护理共享治理教育项目对护士长关于可持续卓越护理及赋权知识的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 11;20(2):e0307798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307798. eCollection 2025.
2
An innovative approach to hospital-wide interprofessional capacity building: Côte d'Ivoire National Cancer Center project.一种医院范围内跨专业能力建设的创新方法:科特迪瓦国家癌症中心项目。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 31;25(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06639-4.
3
Shared clinical decision-making experiences in nursing: a qualitative study.
护理中的共享临床决策经验:一项定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jun 1;20(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00597-0.
4
Do Men Receive Information Required for Shared Decision Making About PSA Testing? Results from a National Survey.男性是否获得了关于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测共同决策所需的信息?一项全国性调查的结果。
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Dec;31(4):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0870-8.
5
Nursing domain of CI governance: recommendations for health IT adoption and optimization.CI 治理的护理领域:健康信息技术采用和优化的建议。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 May;22(3):697-706. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocu001. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
6
Consideration of shared decision making in nursing: a review of clinicians' perceptions and interventions.护理中共同决策的考量:临床医生认知与干预的综述
Open Nurs J. 2009 Oct 2;3:65-75. doi: 10.2174/1874434600903010065.