Lim Jae-Yol, Kim Han Su, Kim Young-Ho, Kim Kwang-Moon, Choi Hong-Shik
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, Yongdong Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 146-92 Dokok Dong, Kangnam Gu, CPO Box 1217, Seoul, 135-720, South Korea.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Mar;265(3):321-6. doi: 10.1007/s00405-007-0458-y. Epub 2007 Oct 2.
Both PMMA (polymethylmetacrylate) microspheres (PM) and stabilized hyaluronic acid (HA) are recently used for facial augmentation. The aim of this study was to test functional effect, durability, and safety of the injection of these two materials into true vocal folds, and test their availability as injection laryngoplasty materials in vivo canine model. The study was carried out with 16 beagle dogs (8 males and 8 females, average weight of 12.4 kg). No biological difference was detected between two groups; PM (Artecoll) injection and HA (Restylane) injection group. After inducing complete unilateral paralysis of the recurrent laryngeal nerve of the dogs, either PM or HA was injected into the paralyzed vocal fold. One, 3, 6, and 9 months after the injection, clinical outcomes and videostroboscopic findings were evaluated by investigators who were blind to the injection materials. Histological study and microscopic computerized augmentation dimension analysis were also performed. In HA injection group, up to 30% the HA was gradually resorbed over time. However, in PM group, the dimension of the augmented region after 9 months was similar to that after 1 month. In both groups, the mucosal waves of the vocal folds decreased in amplitude and periodicity, but they were still well detected during the follow-up periods. Acute immune reaction to HA was not detected, but some degree of foreign body reaction occurred in PM injection group. Both PM and HA are safe and relatively durable in vocal folds and they are considered as useful candidates for injection laryngoplasty.
聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)微球(PM)和稳定化透明质酸(HA)最近都被用于面部填充。本研究的目的是测试将这两种材料注射到真性声带中的功能效果、持久性和安全性,并在体内犬模型中测试它们作为注射喉成形术材料的适用性。该研究使用了16只比格犬(8只雄性和8只雌性,平均体重12.4千克)。在PM(爱贝芙)注射组和HA(瑞蓝)注射组之间未检测到生物学差异。在诱导犬的喉返神经完全单侧麻痹后,将PM或HA注射到麻痹的声带中。注射后1、3、6和9个月,由对注射材料不知情的研究人员评估临床结果和频闪喉镜检查结果。还进行了组织学研究和微观计算机化增大尺寸分析。在HA注射组中,随着时间的推移,高达30%的HA逐渐被吸收。然而,在PM组中,9个月后增大区域的尺寸与1个月后相似。在两组中,声带的黏膜波振幅和周期性均降低,但在随访期间仍能很好地检测到。未检测到对HA的急性免疫反应,但在PM注射组中发生了一定程度的异物反应。PM和HA在声带中都是安全且相对持久的,它们被认为是注射喉成形术的有用候选材料。