Suppr超能文献

将心理健康服务纳入初级保健可消除黑人和白人老年人在获得心理健康服务方面的种族差异。

Integration of mental health services into primary care overcomes ethnic disparities in access to mental health services between black and white elderly.

作者信息

Ayalon Liat, Areán Patricia A, Linkins Karen, Lynch Marty, Estes Carroll L

机构信息

School of Social Work, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.

出版信息

Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;15(10):906-12. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318135113e.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors evaluated whether the integration of mental health into primary care overcomes ethnic disparities in access to and participation in mental health (MH) and substance abuse (SA) treatment.

METHODS

The authors conducted site-specific analysis of a multisite clinical trial to compare participation of black and white elderly in an integrated model of care (all MH/SA services are provided at primary care clinics) versus an enhanced referral model of care (all MH/SA services are provided at specialized MH clinics). In all, 183 elderly (56% black) diagnosed with depression (82%), anxiety (32%), and/or problem drinking (22%) were randomized.

RESULTS

Blacks in the integrated arm were significantly more likely to have at least one MH/SA visit (77.5%) relative to blacks in the enhanced referral arm (22%; adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 14.13; confidence interval [CI]: 4.76-41.95, Wald chi(2): 22.75, df = 1, p <0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between whites in the integrated treatment arm (66.6%) and whites in the enhanced referral arm (46.9%, adjusted OR: 2.98; CI: 0.98-9.06, Wald chi(2): 3.72, df = 1, p = 0.05). In the enhanced referral arm, blacks had a significantly smaller number of overall MH/SA visits (mean [SD]: 2.08 [5.28]) relative to whites (mean [SD]: 5.31 [7.76], adjusted incident rate ratio [IRR]: 2.87; CI: 1.06-7.73, Wald chi(2): 4.37, df = 1, p = 0.03). In the integrated arm, there was no statistically significant difference between blacks (mean [SD]: 3.22 [3.71]) and whites (mean [SD]: 2.75 [4.29], adjusted IRR: 0.58; CI: 0.25-1.33, Wald chi(2): 1.64, df = 1, p = 0.20). For both groups, time between baseline evaluation to first MH/SA visit was significantly shorter in the integrated treatment arm (for blacks: mean days [SD]: 31.06 [28.66]; for whites: mean days [SD]: 22.18 [33.88]) than in the enhanced referral arm (mean [SD]: 62.45 [43.53], adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 7.82; CI: 3.65-16.75, Wald chi(2): 28.02, df = 1, p <0.0001; mean [SD]: 63.46 [32.41], adjusted HR: 2.48; CI: 1.20-5.13, Wald chi(2): 6.02, df = 1, p = 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

An integrated model of care is particularly effective in improving access to and participation in MH/SA treatment among black primary care patients.

摘要

目的

作者评估了将心理健康服务整合到初级保健中是否能克服在获得和参与心理健康(MH)及药物滥用(SA)治疗方面的种族差异。

方法

作者对一项多中心临床试验进行了特定地点分析,以比较黑人和白人老年人在综合护理模式(所有MH/SA服务均在初级保健诊所提供)与强化转诊护理模式(所有MH/SA服务均在专门的MH诊所提供)中的参与情况。共有183名被诊断患有抑郁症(82%)、焦虑症(32%)和/或问题饮酒(22%)的老年人(56%为黑人)被随机分组。

结果

与强化转诊组中的黑人(22%)相比,综合护理组中的黑人进行至少一次MH/SA就诊的可能性显著更高(77.5%;调整后的优势比[OR]:14.13;置信区间[CI]:4.76 - 41.95,Wald卡方值:22.75,自由度 = 1,p <0.0001)。综合治疗组中的白人(66.6%)与强化转诊组中的白人(46.9%)之间无统计学显著差异(调整后的OR:2.98;CI:0.98 - 9.06,Wald卡方值:3.72,自由度 = 1,p = 0.05)。在强化转诊组中,黑人的总体MH/SA就诊次数(均值[标准差]:2.08 [5.28])显著少于白人(均值[标准差]:5.31 [7.76],调整后的发病率比[IRR]:2.87;CI:1.06 - 7.73,Wald卡方值:4.37,自由度 = 1,p = 0.03)。在综合护理组中,黑人(均值[标准差]:3.22 [3.71])与白人(均值[标准差]:2.75 [4.29])之间无统计学显著差异(调整后的IRR:0.58;CI:0.25 - 1.33,Wald卡方值:1.64,自由度 = 1,p = 0.20)。对于两组而言,从基线评估到首次MH/SA就诊的时间在综合治疗组中(黑人:均值天数[标准差]:31.06 [28.66];白人:均值天数[标准差]:22.18 [33.88])显著短于强化转诊组(均值[标准差]:62.45 [43.53],调整后的风险比[HR]:7.82;CI:3.65 - 16.75,Wald卡方值:28.02,自由度 = 1,p <0.0001;均值[标准差]:63.46 [32.41],调整后的HR:2.48;CI:1.20 - 5.13,Wald卡方值:6.02,自由度 = 1,p = 0.01)。

结论

综合护理模式在改善黑人初级保健患者获得和参与MH/SA治疗方面特别有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验