Suppr超能文献

尖端培养对带隧道血液透析导管感染管理的影响。

Impact of tip culture on the management of infected tunneled hemodialysis catheters.

作者信息

Cooper Emily T, Cohen Raphael M, Berns Jeffrey S, Kornfield Zev Noah, Trerotola Scott O

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, 1 Silverstein, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Oct;18(10):1227-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.06.031.

Abstract

PURPOSE

It is common practice to perform culture of the tip of a catheter when a previously indwelling vascular catheter is removed for presumed infection. This study was conducted to determine the effect of hemodialysis catheter tip cultures (CTCs) on patient management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients whose tunneled hemodialysis catheter (TDC) was removed for infection and who had a CTC between July 2001 and June 2006 were identified. The study sample included 242 patients with 330 catheters (109 men, 133 women). Patients' mean age was 58 years (range, 22-94 y). Catheter tip and blood culture (BC) results obtained during the event leading to catheter removal were recorded. Antimicrobial therapy before and after cultures was recorded. Medical records were reviewed for any indication that the treatment plan was influenced by tip culture results.

RESULTS

Of 330 catheters, 134 had positive CTC findings; of these, complete records were available for 52 catheters. The treatment plan for patients with suspected catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) leading to TDC removal did not change in response to semiquantitative CTC results (51 of 52 patients; 98%). In a single case in which CTC results impacted management, this was because of a delay in processing BCs. Negative CTC findings (n = 108) never changed management (ie, resulted in cessation of antibiotic therapy). Seventy-three percent of patients (n = 38) received empiric antibiotics before any culture results. In these cases, the BC susceptibility profiles confirmed the appropriateness of the initial treatment (n = 10) or led to a change (n = 28).

CONCLUSIONS

CTC did not alter management in the treatment of TDC infection. Because CTCs increase costs, their routine use should be abandoned in this population.

摘要

目的

当因疑似感染而拔除先前留置的血管导管时,对导管尖端进行培养是常见的做法。本研究旨在确定血液透析导管尖端培养(CTC)对患者管理的影响。

材料与方法

确定2001年7月至2006年6月期间因感染而拔除隧道式血液透析导管(TDC)且进行了CTC的患者。研究样本包括242例患者的330根导管(男性109例,女性133例)。患者的平均年龄为58岁(范围22 - 94岁)。记录在导致导管拔除的事件期间获得的导管尖端和血培养(BC)结果。记录培养前后的抗菌治疗情况。查阅病历以寻找治疗方案受尖端培养结果影响的任何迹象。

结果

在330根导管中,134根CTC结果为阳性;其中,52根导管有完整记录。导致TDC拔除的疑似导管相关血流感染(CRBSI)患者的治疗方案未因半定量CTC结果而改变(52例患者中的51例;98%)。在1例CTC结果影响管理的病例中,这是由于血培养处理延迟。CTC结果为阴性(n = 108)从未改变管理(即导致抗生素治疗停止)。73%的患者(n = 38)在任何培养结果出来之前接受了经验性抗生素治疗。在这些病例中,血培养药敏谱证实了初始治疗的适宜性(n = 10)或导致了治疗改变(n = 28)。

结论

CTC在TDC感染治疗中未改变管理方式。由于CTC增加了成本,在该人群中应放弃其常规使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验