Fereidoni Masoud, Javan Mohammad, Semnanian Saeed, Ahmadiani Abolhasan
Department of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran.
Behav Pharmacol. 2007 Nov;18(7):667-72. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e3282f007cb.
Ultra-low doses of morphine (UL-morphine) induce hyperalgesia, which is assumed to be mediated by stimulatory G proteins (G(alphas)) signaling pathway. G(alphas) pathway inhibition and chronic stress both attenuate development of tolerance to analgesic effect of morphine. This study evaluated the effect of chronic stress on UL-morphine-induced hyperalgesia to find out if chronic stress interacts with the G(alphas) signaling pathway. Repeated daily forced swim stress was applied to induce chronic stress. UL-morphine (1 microg/kg, intraperitoneal)-induced hyperalgesia was assessed using the tail-flick test on day 6, in male rats that during days 1-5 received different treatments of swim stress, dexamethasone, swim stress following adrenalectomy (ADX) or swim stress after sham operation. Chronic stress by itself induced hyperalgesia in control and sham-operated rats but inhibited UL-morphine-induced hyperalgesia. In ADX animals, chronic stress did not produce hyperalgesia and could not inhibit UL-morphine-induced hyperalgesia. Chronic dexamethasone produced hyperalgesia but did not change the UL-morphine-induced hyperalgesia. Inhibition of UL-morphine hyperalgesia by chronic stress suggests that chronic stress interacts with the G(alphas) signaling pathway, which is responsible for UL-morphine-induced hyperalgesia. The absence of this effect in the ADX-rats or after repetitive dexamethasone administration demonstrates that hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activation is necessary for controlling UL-morphine-induced hyperalgesia. Finally, the interaction of stress with the G(alphas) signaling pathway may provide an explanation for the inhibitory effect of stress on development of tolerance to the analgesic effect of morphine.
超低剂量吗啡(UL-吗啡)可诱发痛觉过敏,一般认为这是由刺激性G蛋白(G(αs))信号通路介导的。G(αs)通路抑制和慢性应激均可减弱对吗啡镇痛作用的耐受性发展。本研究评估了慢性应激对UL-吗啡诱发痛觉过敏的影响,以确定慢性应激是否与G(αs)信号通路相互作用。每日重复强迫游泳应激用于诱发慢性应激。在第1至5天接受不同处理(游泳应激、地塞米松、肾上腺切除术后(ADX)的游泳应激或假手术后的游泳应激)的雄性大鼠中,于第6天使用甩尾试验评估UL-吗啡(1微克/千克,腹腔注射)诱发的痛觉过敏。慢性应激本身在对照大鼠和假手术大鼠中诱发了痛觉过敏,但抑制了UL-吗啡诱发的痛觉过敏。在ADX动物中,慢性应激未产生痛觉过敏,也无法抑制UL-吗啡诱发的痛觉过敏。慢性地塞米松产生了痛觉过敏,但未改变UL-吗啡诱发的痛觉过敏。慢性应激对UL-吗啡痛觉过敏的抑制表明,慢性应激与G(αs)信号通路相互作用,该信号通路负责UL-吗啡诱发的痛觉过敏。在ADX大鼠中或重复给予地塞米松后未出现这种效应,表明下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴激活对于控制UL-吗啡诱发的痛觉过敏是必要的。最后,应激与G(αs)信号通路的相互作用可能为应激对吗啡镇痛作用耐受性发展的抑制作用提供一种解释。