Ahmar W, Quarin T, Ajani A, Kennedy M, Grigg L
Department of Cardiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2008 Sep;38(9):714-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01476.x. Epub 2007 Sep 11.
BACKGROUND: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) mandates rapid percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for optimal outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess our hospital practice for managing acute STEMI, identify processes associated with time delays, instrument changes to our acute STEMI management protocol and assess their effectiveness for improving our door-to-balloon time. METHODS: We aimed to achieve this through the establishment of a quality improvement programme involving the cardiology and emergency departments. We analysed consecutive patients presenting with STEMI (April to September 2005 (group A) and the corresponding period in 2006 (group B), and compared patients presenting 'in hours' (0700 hours to 1800 hours (Monday to Friday)) versus 'out of hours' (all other times including public holidays). RESULTS: In group A, 38 patients presented with a STEMI. Assessing time-to-treatment analysis, the median door to balloon time for primary PCI was significantly greater for 'out of hours' than 'in hours' (120 vs 67 min). The greatest time delay to PCI was from the PCI decision time to catheter laboratory arrival. Local changes were implemented to improve 'out of hours' times, including initiation of 'Code AMI'. There were 59 patients in group B. We found that our changes led to a 29% improvement in 'out of hours' door-to-balloon time (median time 82 min, P = 0.005) with 69% being managed < or =90 min (P = 0.049) (group B). CONCLUSION: We have shown that ongoing review through a quality improvement programme improves door-to-balloon times, which is integral in the optimal management of patients with acute STEMI treated with primary PCI.
背景:ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)需要迅速进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)以获得最佳疗效。本研究的目的是评估我院急性STEMI的治疗实践,确定与时间延迟相关的流程,对急性STEMI管理方案进行调整并评估其对缩短我们的门球时间的有效性。 方法:我们旨在通过建立一个涉及心脏病学和急诊科的质量改进项目来实现这一目标。我们分析了连续出现STEMI的患者(2005年4月至9月(A组)和2006年同期(B组)),并比较了“工作时间内”(07:00至18:00(周一至周五))与“工作时间外”(包括公共假日在内的所有其他时间)就诊的患者。 结果:A组有38例患者出现STEMI。评估治疗时间分析,非工作时间进行直接PCI的门球时间中位数显著长于工作时间(120分钟对67分钟)。PCI最大的时间延迟是从PCI决策时间到导管室到达时间。实施了局部改变以改善非工作时间的情况,包括启动“急性心肌梗死代码”。B组有59例患者。我们发现我们的改变使非工作时间的门球时间改善了29%(中位数时间82分钟,P = 0.005),69%的患者在90分钟内完成治疗(P = 0.049)(B组)。 结论:我们已经表明,通过质量改进项目进行持续审查可改善门球时间,这对于接受直接PCI治疗的急性STEMI患者最佳管理至关重要。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008-2-1