Department of Community and Family Medicine, The Chinese University of, Hong Kong.
Med Teach. 2007 Sep;29(6):e175-83. doi: 10.1080/01421590601050585.
Studies regarding the effectiveness of CME programmes on physicians' behaviour and communication skills showed inconsistent results. Few randomized controlled trials have been conducted in Asia.
To evaluate the effectiveness of a 4 2-hour education programme to improve GP interviewing behaviours, 16 general practitioners were randomized to the intervention and control groups, respectively. Physicians assigned to the intervention group received 8 hours of training emphasizing interviewing behaviours in the diagnosis and treatment of depression and generalized anxiety disorders (GDS). Those assigned to the control group did not receive any training until the completion of study. Standardized patients were used to evaluate the performance of physicians. Two consultations before and after enrolling in the education programme were videotaped. Independent evaluations of consultations were made by a trained clinical psychologist and a social worker blinded to the study status of physicians. The rating schedule for the videotapes was based on the tasks listed on the Calgary Cambridge Observation Guide.
The change of score between the intervention and control physicians was significantly different in 'active listening and facilitating patients' response' (p = 0.011) with the intervention physicians having improvement of score. For 'non-verbals', 'understanding patient's perspective' and 'negotiating mutual plan of action', positive change of score in the intervention physicians were seen when compared to that of the control, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06, p = 0.05, p = 0.06, respectively). However, for 'opening', 'structuring the consultation', 'explanation and planning' and 'closure', there were no statistical significant differences between control and intervention group.
Our results showed that only certain communication skills, such as active listening and facilitating patient's response, can be taught in the management of depression and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in Chinese primary care physicians.
关于 CME 项目对医生行为和沟通技巧的有效性的研究结果不一致。亚洲进行的随机对照试验很少。
为了评估一项 4 个 2 小时的教育计划对改善全科医生访谈行为的有效性,16 名全科医生被随机分配到干预组和对照组。被分配到干预组的医生接受了 8 小时的培训,重点是在诊断和治疗抑郁症和广泛性焦虑症(GDS)方面的访谈行为。被分配到对照组的医生在研究结束前没有接受任何培训。使用标准化患者来评估医生的表现。在参加教育计划之前和之后进行了两次咨询,并用录像记录下来。由一名经过培训的临床心理学家和一名对医生的研究状况不知情的社会工作者对咨询进行独立评估。录像带的评分表基于卡尔加里剑桥观察指南中列出的任务。
干预组和对照组医生之间的分数变化在“积极倾听和促进患者反应”方面有显著差异(p = 0.011),干预组医生的分数有所提高。对于“非语言”、“理解患者的观点”和“协商共同行动计划”,干预组医生的评分有积极变化,但与对照组相比,差异没有达到统计学意义(p = 0.06、p = 0.05、p = 0.06)。然而,对于“开场”、“组织咨询”、“解释和计划”和“结束”,对照组和干预组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。
我们的结果表明,只有某些沟通技巧,如积极倾听和促进患者反应,可以在中文基层医疗医生管理抑郁症和广泛性焦虑症(GAD)中教授。