Nichols Gregory A, Koro Carol E
Kaiser Permanente, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon 97227-1098, USA.
Clin Ther. 2007 Aug;29(8):1761-70. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.08.022.
Estimates of myopathy rates in the literature are based on adverse events reported in clinical trials, which may not be representative of the clinical practice setting.
The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of myopathic events, particularly myalgia, myositis, and rhabdomyolysis in a community-based practice among a cohort of subjects with or without diabetes, some of whom received statin treatment.
In this retrospective data analysis, we identified members of a health maintenance organization (HMO) who initiated statin treatment between 1997 and 2004 and classified them into 2 groups: those subjects with diabetes and those without. We matched them to an equal number of health plan members based on age group, diabetes diagnosis, and year of health plan enrollment. We defined 4 levels of myopathic events according to the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's definitions as follows: myalgia, mild myositis, severe myositis, and rhabdomyolysis. Subjects were observed for approximately 9 years. Prevalence rates were calculated by adjusting for known myopathic risk factors and also by utilizing Cox regression models to identify predictors of time for myopathic events.
Of the 35,413 HMO members initially assessed for inclusion, 32,225 were identified and classified into the 2 cohorts: diabetes (n = 10,247) and nondiabetes (n = 21,978). A greater proportion of statin initiators in both the diabetes (7.9% vs 5.5%; P < 0.001) and nondiabetes cohorts (9.0% vs 3.7%; P < 0.001) experienced myopathic events. However, 95% of events were myalgia or mild myositis. The prevalence of severe myositis was 0.4 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 0.2-0.7) and 0.8 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 0.6-1.1) among statin initiators with or without diabetes, respectively. By comparison, rates were 0.3 (95% CI, 0.1-0.5) and 0.2 (95% CI, 0.1-0.4) per 1000 person-years among nonstatin users with or without diabetes, respectively. Rates of rhabdomyolysis were 0.1 (95% CI, 0.1-0.3) and 0.2 (95% CI, 0.1-0.5) per 1000 person-years among statin and non-statin users with diabetes, respectively, and 0.2 (95% CI, 0.1-0.4) in both groups without diabetes.
Statin initiation was associated with an approximate doubling of the risk for any myopathic event but did not appear to be associated with an increased risk for rhabdomyolysis in these patients. Because clinically significant elevations of creatine kinase levels were rare, statins appeared to be well tolerated in diabetic and nondiabetic patients who used them.
文献中对肌病发生率的估计是基于临床试验中报告的不良事件,而这些事件可能无法代表临床实际情况。
本研究的目的是估计在一个以社区为基础的医疗机构中,有或没有糖尿病的一组受试者(其中一些接受他汀类药物治疗)发生肌病事件的患病率,特别是肌痛、肌炎和横纹肌溶解症的患病率。
在这项回顾性数据分析中,我们确定了1997年至2004年间开始使用他汀类药物治疗的健康维护组织(HMO)成员,并将他们分为两组:糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者。我们根据年龄组、糖尿病诊断和健康计划注册年份,将他们与相同数量的健康计划成员进行匹配。我们根据美国心脏病学会、美国心脏协会和美国国立心肺血液研究所的定义,将肌病事件分为4个级别:肌痛、轻度肌炎、重度肌炎和横纹肌溶解症。对受试者进行了约9年的观察。通过对已知的肌病风险因素进行调整,并利用Cox回归模型来确定肌病事件发生时间的预测因素,计算患病率。
在最初评估纳入的35413名HMO成员中,有32225名被确定并分为两组:糖尿病组(n = 10247)和非糖尿病组(n = 21978)。糖尿病组(7.9%对5.5%;P < 0.001)和非糖尿病组(9.0%对3.7%;P < 0.001)中开始使用他汀类药物的患者发生肌病事件的比例更高。然而,95%的事件为肌痛或轻度肌炎。在有或没有糖尿病的他汀类药物起始使用者中,重度肌炎的患病率分别为每1000人年0.4(95%CI,0.2 - 0.7)和每1000人年0.8(95%CI,0.6 - 1.1)。相比之下,有或没有糖尿病的非他汀类药物使用者中,患病率分别为每1000人年0.3(95%CI,0.1 - 0.5)和每1000人年0.2(95%CI,0.1 - 0.4)。在有糖尿病的他汀类药物使用者和非他汀类药物使用者中,横纹肌溶解症的发生率分别为每1000人年0.1(95%CI,0.1 - 0.3)和每1000人年0.2(95%CI,0.1 - 0.5),在没有糖尿病的两组中均为每1000人年0.2(95%CI,0.1 - 0.4)。
开始使用他汀类药物与任何肌病事件风险增加约一倍相关,但在这些患者中似乎与横纹肌溶解症风险增加无关。由于肌酸激酶水平的临床显著升高很少见,他汀类药物在使用它们的糖尿病和非糖尿病患者中似乎耐受性良好。