Suppr超能文献

联合医院基金关于评估健康信息交换的会议。

The United Hospital Fund meeting on evaluating health information exchange.

作者信息

Hripcsak George, Kaushal Rainu, Johnson Kevin B, Ash Joan S, Bates David W, Block Rachel, Frisse Mark E, Kern Lisa M, Marchibroda Janet, Overhage J Marc, Wilcox Adam B

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, 622 West 168th Street, VC5, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2007 Dec;40(6 Suppl):S3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.08.002. Epub 2007 Aug 30.

Abstract

Health information exchange (HIE) projects are sweeping the nation, with hopes that they will lead to high quality, efficient care, yet the literature on their measured benefits remains sparse. To the degree that the field adopts a common set of evaluation strategies, duplicate work can be reduced and meta-analysis will be easier. The United Hospital Fund sponsored a meeting to address HIE evaluation. HIE projects are diverse with many kinds of effects. Assessment of the operation of the HIE infrastructure and of usage should be done for all projects. The immediate business case must be demonstrated for the stakeholders. Rigorous evaluation of the effect on quality may only need to be done for a handful of projects, with simpler process studies elsewhere. Unintended consequences should be monitored. A comprehensive study of return on investment requires an assessment of all effects. Program evaluation across several projects may help set future policy.

摘要

健康信息交换(HIE)项目正在席卷全国,人们希望这些项目能带来高质量、高效的医疗服务,但关于其实际效益的文献仍然稀少。如果该领域采用一套通用的评估策略,就可以减少重复工作,也更便于进行荟萃分析。联合医院基金主办了一次会议来讨论HIE评估问题。HIE项目多种多样,会产生多种效果。所有项目都应对HIE基础设施的运行情况和使用情况进行评估。必须向利益相关者展示直接的商业案例。可能只需对少数项目进行关于质量影响的严格评估,其他地方进行较简单的过程研究即可。应监测意外后果。对投资回报率进行全面研究需要评估所有影响。对多个项目进行项目评估可能有助于制定未来政策。

相似文献

1
The United Hospital Fund meeting on evaluating health information exchange.
J Biomed Inform. 2007 Dec;40(6 Suppl):S3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.08.002. Epub 2007 Aug 30.
2
Qualitative evaluation of health information exchange efforts.
J Biomed Inform. 2007 Dec;40(6 Suppl):S33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.08.001. Epub 2007 Aug 30.
3
Playing smallball: approaches to evaluating pilot health information exchange systems.
J Biomed Inform. 2007 Dec;40(6 Suppl):S21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Sep 1.
4
Evaluating public health uses of health information exchange.
J Biomed Inform. 2007 Dec;40(6 Suppl):S46-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.08.003. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
5
Developing common methods for evaluating health information exchange.
J Biomed Inform. 2007 Dec;40(6 Suppl):S1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.08.005. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
6
Health information exchange and patient safety.
J Biomed Inform. 2007 Dec;40(6 Suppl):S40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.08.011. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
7
Health information technology and health information exchange in New York State: new initiatives in implementation and evaluation.
J Biomed Inform. 2007 Dec;40(6 Suppl):S17-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.08.010. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
8
Health information exchange policy and evaluation.
J Biomed Inform. 2007 Dec;40(6 Suppl):S11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Sep 2.
10
A framework for systematic evaluation of health information infrastructure progress in communities.
J Biomed Inform. 2007 Apr;40(2):100-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2006.01.002. Epub 2006 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

2
Personalized Medicine in Oncology in the Developing World: Barriers and Concepts to Improve .
World J Oncol. 2021 Jun;12(2-3):50-60. doi: 10.14740/wjon1345. Epub 2021 May 14.
3
The complementary nature of query-based and directed health information exchange in primary care practice.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jan 1;27(1):73-80. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz134.
5
Evaluating the impact of organisational digital maturity on clinical outcomes in secondary care in England.
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 May 16;2:41. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0118-9. eCollection 2019.
6
Diverging views on health information exchange organizations.
Learn Health Syst. 2017 Jun 12;1(3):e10031. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10031. eCollection 2017 Jul.
7
10

本文引用的文献

3
The value of health care information exchange and interoperability.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-10-W5-18. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.10.
4
A randomized, controlled trial of clinical information shared from another institution.
Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Jan;39(1):14-23. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.120794.
5
Electronic laboratory reporting: barriers, solutions and findings.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2001 Nov;7(6):60-6. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200107060-00007.
6
Reduction of redundant laboratory orders by access to computerized patient records.
J Emerg Med. 1998 Nov-Dec;16(6):895-7. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(98)00106-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验