Indiana University Richard M Fairbanks School of Public Health at IUPUI, Department of Health Policy & Management; Center for Biomedical Informatics, the Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, IN.
Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jan 1;27(1):73-80. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz134.
Many policymakers and advocates assume that directed and query-based health information exchange (HIE) work together to meet organizations' interoperability needs, but this is not grounded in a substantial evidence base. This study sought to clarify the relationship between the usage of these 2 approaches to HIE.
System user log files from a regional HIE organization and electronic health record system were combined to model the usage of HIE associated with a patient visit at 3 federally qualified health centers in New York. Regression models tested the hypothesis that directed HIE usage was associated with query-based usage and adjusted for factors reflective of the FITT (Fit between Individuals, Task & Technology) framework. Follow-up interviews with 8 key informants helped interpret findings.
Usage of query-based HIE occurred in 3.1% of encounters and directed HIE in 23.5%. Query-based usage was 0.6 percentage points higher when directed HIE provided imaging information, and 4.8 percentage points higher when directed HIE provided clinical documents. The probability of query-based HIE was lower for specialist visits, higher for postdischarge visits, and higher for encounters with nurse practitioners. Informants used query-based HIE after directed HIE to obtain additional information, support transitions of care, or in cases of abnormal results.
The complementary nature of directed and query-based HIE indicates that both HIE functionalities should be incorporated into EHR Certification Criteria.
Quantitative and qualitative findings suggest that directed and query-based HIE exist in a complementary manner in ambulatory care settings.
许多政策制定者和倡导者认为定向和基于查询的健康信息交换(HIE)共同满足组织的互操作性需求,但这并没有建立在坚实的证据基础上。本研究旨在阐明这两种 HIE 方法的使用之间的关系。
将来自区域 HIE 组织和电子健康记录系统的系统用户日志文件合并,以对在纽约的 3 家联邦合格健康中心进行的患者就诊时与 HIE 相关的使用情况进行建模。回归模型检验了以下假设,即定向 HIE 的使用与基于查询的使用相关,并针对反映 FITT(个体、任务和技术之间的适配性)框架的因素进行了调整。对 8 名关键知情者进行了后续访谈,以帮助解释研究结果。
基于查询的 HIE 在 3.1%的就诊中使用,定向 HIE 在 23.5%的就诊中使用。当定向 HIE 提供成像信息时,基于查询的使用增加了 0.6 个百分点,当定向 HIE 提供临床文档时,基于查询的使用增加了 4.8 个百分点。基于查询的 HIE 在专科就诊中较低,在出院后就诊中较高,在有护士从业者参与的就诊中较高。在定向 HIE 之后,知情人使用基于查询的 HIE 是为了获取额外的信息,支持护理过渡,或在出现异常结果的情况下。
定向和基于查询的 HIE 的互补性质表明,这两种 HIE 功能都应纳入 EHR 认证标准。
定量和定性研究结果表明,定向和基于查询的 HIE 在门诊环境中以互补的方式存在。