Hannan Edward L, Racz Michael, Walford Gary, Clark Luther T, Holmes David R, King Spencer B, Sharma Samin
University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Oct 15;100(8):1192-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.05.039. Epub 2007 Aug 2.
Numerous disparities in access to health care by race and gender have been identified in the literature. This study examines differences in the use of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) by race, payer, and income level. Data from New York State's Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System from July 2003 to December 2004 were used to examine use of DES (20,165 patients) relative to BMS (4,547 patients) by race, payer, and annual income level, controlling for a variety of patient and hospital characteristics. African-Americans were found to be less likely to receive DES than other races between July 2003 and March 2004 (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50 to 0.65) and between April 2004 and December 2004 (adjusted OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.90). These disparities were reduced (respective adjusted ORs 0.67, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.77 and 0.81, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.91) when controlling for admitting hospital and hospital volume, but were still significant. Medicaid/self-pay patients, and patients living in zip codes with median annual incomes between $20,000 and $30,000 were also less likely to receive DES in the first time period (adjusted respective ORs 0.80, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.93) and 0.85, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.96). In conclusion, African-Americans and low income groups receive DES less frequently than their counterparts compared with BMS. This is related to the hospitals where they are admitted, but not entirely.
文献中已发现种族和性别在获得医疗保健方面存在诸多差异。本研究考察了按种族、付款方和收入水平划分,药物洗脱支架(DES)与裸金属支架(BMS)使用情况的差异。利用纽约州2003年7月至2004年12月经皮冠状动脉介入治疗报告系统的数据,在控制各种患者和医院特征的情况下,按种族、付款方和年收入水平考察DES(20165例患者)相对于BMS(4547例患者)的使用情况。研究发现,在2003年7月至2004年3月期间(调整优势比[OR]为0.56,95%置信区间[CI]为0.50至0.65)以及2004年4月至12月期间(调整OR为0.74,95%CI为0.61至0.90),非裔美国人接受DES的可能性低于其他种族。在控制收治医院和医院规模后,这些差异有所减小(相应调整后的OR分别为0.67,95%CI为0.58至0.77和0.81,95%CI为0.66至0.91),但仍然显著。在第一个时间段,医疗补助/自费患者以及居住在年收入中位数在20000美元至30000美元之间邮政编码区域的患者接受DES的可能性也较低(相应调整后的OR分别为0.80,95%CI为0.68至0.93)和0.85,95%CI为0.75至0.96)。总之,与BMS相比,非裔美国人和低收入群体接受DES的频率低于其他群体。这与他们所就诊的医院有关,但并非完全如此。