Suppr超能文献

组织多普勒速度和应变不同步性在预测心脏再同步治疗后左心室逆向重构反应中的应用价值

Usefulness of tissue Doppler velocity and strain dyssynchrony for predicting left ventricular reverse remodeling response after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

作者信息

Yu Cheuk-Man, Gorcsan John, Bleeker Gabe B, Zhang Qing, Schalij Martin J, Suffoletto Matthew S, Fung Jeffrey Wing-Hong, Schwartzman David, Chan Yat-Sun, Tanabe Masaki, Bax Jeroen J

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2007 Oct 15;100(8):1263-70. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.05.060. Epub 2007 Aug 20.

Abstract

The assessment of systolic dyssynchrony by echocardiography is useful in predicting a favorable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Tissue Doppler velocity and tissue Doppler longitudinal strain have been suggested for this purpose. This study compared parameters of systolic dyssynchrony derived from these 2 imaging modalities for their predictive values of CRT response. Two hundred fifty-six patients from 3 different centers who received CRT were followed for 6 +/- 3 months. Parameters of systolic dyssynchrony based on tissue Doppler velocity and strain imaging were assessed for the prediction of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (reduction of LV end-systolic volume > or =15%). These included time to peak systolic velocity (or peak strain) of 12 LV segments to calculate the SD (Ts-SD or Tepsilon-SD), maximal difference in delay (Ts-Diff or Tepsilon-Diff), and opposite wall delay (Ts-OW or Tepsilon-OW). The septal-to-lateral delay (Ts-Sep-Lat or Tepsilon-Sep-Lat) was also measured. LV reverse remodeling, defined as improvement in end-systolic volume > or =15%, was observed in 141 patients (55%). All 4 tissue velocity parameters predicted LV reverse remodeling, and the areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves were 0.86, 0.85, 0.84, and 0.79 for Ts-SD, Ts-Diff, Ts-OW, and Ts-Sep-Lat, respectively (all p <0.001). The cut-off values derived from receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis were 33 ms for Ts-SD, 100 ms for Ts-Diff, 90 ms for Ts-OW, and 60 ms for Ts-Sep-Lat, and their sensitivities were 93%, 92%, 81%, and 70%, with specificities of 78%, 68%, 80%, and 76%, respectively. In contrast, none of the longitudinal strain parameters predicted LV reverse remodeling. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves ranged from 0.49 to 0.53 (all p = NS). The same conclusions were obtained in subgroup analyses of QRS duration (120 to 150 vs >150 ms) and ischemic or nonischemic cause of heart failure. In conclusion, parameters of tissue Doppler longitudinal velocity, but not longitudinal strain, predicted LV reverse remodeling after CRT.

摘要

通过超声心动图评估收缩期不同步性有助于预测心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)的良好反应。为此已提出使用组织多普勒速度和组织多普勒纵向应变。本研究比较了从这两种成像方式得出的收缩期不同步性参数对CRT反应的预测价值。对来自3个不同中心的256例接受CRT的患者进行了6±3个月的随访。评估基于组织多普勒速度和应变成像的收缩期不同步性参数,以预测左心室(LV)逆向重构(左心室收缩末期容积减少≥15%)。这些参数包括12个左心室节段的收缩期峰值速度(或峰值应变)时间,用于计算标准差(Ts-SD或Tepsilon-SD)、延迟的最大差值(Ts-Diff或Tepsilon-Diff)以及对侧壁延迟(Ts-OW或Tepsilon-OW)。还测量了室间隔至侧壁延迟(Ts-Sep-Lat或Tepsilon-Sep-Lat)。141例患者(55%)出现左心室逆向重构,定义为收缩末期容积改善≥15%。所有4个组织速度参数均能预测左心室逆向重构,Ts-SD、Ts-Diff、Ts-OW和Ts-Sep-Lat的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.86、0.85、0.84和0.79(均p<0.001)。通过受试者工作特征曲线分析得出的截断值分别为:Ts-SD为33毫秒,Ts-Diff为100毫秒,Ts-OW为90毫秒,Ts-Sep-Lat为60毫秒,其敏感性分别为93%、92%81%和70%,特异性分别为78%、68%、80%和76%。相比之下,纵向应变参数均不能预测左心室逆向重构。受试者工作特征曲线下面积在0.49至0.53之间(均p=无显著性差异)。在QRS波时限(120至150毫秒与>150毫秒)以及缺血性或非缺血性心力衰竭病因的亚组分析中也得出了相同结论。总之,组织多普勒纵向速度参数而非纵向应变参数可预测CRT后的左心室逆向重构。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验