Ridgway Kathy, Lalljie Sam P D, Smith Roger M
Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Unilever, Colworth Park, Sharnbrook, Bedford, Bedfordshire MK44 1LQ, UK.
J Chromatogr A. 2007 Dec 7;1174(1-2):20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.09.025. Epub 2007 Sep 16.
A comparison is made between static headspace analysis and headspace solid-phase dynamic extraction (HS-SPDE) for the quantitative determination of trace level BTEX solvents (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and o-, m-, and p-xylene) in soft drinks. Two non-polar extraction phases were investigated for SPDE using an automated sampler with a gas-tight syringe equipped with a special needle coated on the inside with the extraction phase. Following adsorption onto the phase, the analytes were thermally desorbed directly into a GC-MS. The techniques were optimised and evaluated by analysis of spiked soft drink samples. The use of the SPDE device gave comparable results to the static headspace method, with lower detection limits for some compounds, and also offers advantages for applications where lower temperatures are preferred.
对静态顶空分析和顶空固相动态萃取(HS-SPDE)进行了比较,以定量测定软饮料中痕量水平的BTEX溶剂(苯、甲苯、乙苯以及邻二甲苯、间二甲苯和对二甲苯)。使用配备气密注射器的自动进样器对两种非极性萃取相进行SPDE研究,该气密注射器配有内部涂有萃取相的特殊针头。分析物吸附到萃取相上后,直接热解吸进入气相色谱-质谱联用仪。通过对加标软饮料样品的分析对这些技术进行了优化和评估。SPDE装置的使用与静态顶空法得到的结果相当,某些化合物的检测限更低,并且对于更倾向于较低温度的应用也具有优势。