Armstrong Lawrence E
Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-1110, USA.
J Am Coll Nutr. 2007 Oct;26(5 Suppl):575S-584S. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2007.10719661.
Acknowledging that total body water (TBW) turnover is complex, and that no measurement is valid for all situations, this review evaluates 13 hydration assessment techniques. Although validated laboratory methods exist for TBW and extracellular volume, no evidence incontrovertibly demonstrates that any concentration measurement, including plasma osmolality (P(osm)), accurately represents TBW gain and loss during daily activities. Further, one blood or urine sample cannot validly represent fluctuating TBW and fluid compartments. Future research should (a) evaluate novel techniques that assess hydration in real time and are precise, accurate, reliable, non-invasive, portable, inexpensive, safe, and simple; and (b) clarify the relationship between P(osm) and TBW oscillations in various scenarios.
鉴于总体水(TBW)周转情况复杂,且没有一种测量方法适用于所有情况,本综述评估了13种水合作用评估技术。尽管存在用于测量TBW和细胞外液量的经过验证的实验室方法,但没有证据能无可争议地证明任何浓度测量方法,包括血浆渗透压(P(osm)),能准确反映日常活动期间TBW的增减情况。此外,一份血液或尿液样本无法有效代表波动的TBW和体液区室。未来的研究应:(a)评估能够实时评估水合作用、精确、准确、可靠、无创、便携、廉价、安全且简单的新技术;(b)阐明在各种情况下P(osm)与TBW波动之间的关系。