Tan David S P, Marchió Caterina, Jones Robin L, Savage Kay, Smith Ian E, Dowsett Mitch, Reis-Filho Jorge S
The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JB, UK.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Sep;111(1):27-44. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9756-8. Epub 2007 Oct 6.
We analysed the clinical features, distribution of basal markers, prevalence of oncogene amplification, and outcome of triple negative (TN) compared to those of non-TN cancers in a series of adjuvant-anthracycline treated breast cancer patients.
We examined the prognostic impact of the TN and BL phenotype in 245 breast cancer patients uniformly treated with adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy following primary surgery, with regards to local relapse-free (LRFS), metastasis free (MFS), and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS). A comparative analysis of the clinicopathological characteristics, expression of basal markers (cytokeratins (Cks) 5/6, 14, 17, EGFR, and caveolin 1 and 2), MIB-1, p53 and topoisomerase II alpha, and prevalence of CCND1, MYC and TOP2A amplification in TN and non-TN breast tumours was performed.
TN cancers were significantly associated with the expression of basal markers (all P < 0.0001). However 19.4% of TN tumours were negative for basal markers, whilst 7.3% of non-TN tumours expressed basal markers. TN phenotype was significantly associated with p53, MIB-1 and topoisomerase II alpha (all, P < 0.01) expression. No TN cancer harboured amplification of CCND1 or TOP2A. In univariate analysis, TN and BL phenotype were significantly associated with shorter MFS (both, P < 0.01) and BCSS (both, P < 0.005) but not LRFS.
Despite treatment with standard dose anthracycline-based chemotherapy, the clinical outcome of TN and BL cancers remains poor. Alternative chemotherapeutic regimens and/or novel therapeutic approaches are warranted. Although a significant phenotypic overlap exists between TN and basal-like tumours, the TN phenotype is not an ideal surrogate marker for basal-like breast cancers.
我们分析了一系列接受蒽环类辅助治疗的乳腺癌患者中三阴性(TN)与非TN癌症的临床特征、基底标志物分布、癌基因扩增发生率及预后情况。
我们研究了245例接受基于蒽环类辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者中TN和基底样(BL)表型对局部无复发生存期(LRFS)、无转移生存期(MFS)及乳腺癌特异性生存期(BCSS)的预后影响。对TN和非TN乳腺肿瘤的临床病理特征、基底标志物(细胞角蛋白(Cks)5/6、14、17、表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)、小窝蛋白1和2)、MIB-1、p53和拓扑异构酶IIα的表达以及CCND1、MYC和TOP2A扩增发生率进行了对比分析。
TN癌症与基底标志物的表达显著相关(所有P<0.0001)。然而,19.4%的TN肿瘤基底标志物呈阴性,而7.3%的非TN肿瘤表达基底标志物。TN表型与p53、MIB-1和拓扑异构酶IIα(所有P<0.01)的表达显著相关。没有TN癌症存在CCND1或TOP2A扩增。在单因素分析中,TN和BL表型与较短的MFS(两者P<0.01)和BCSS(两者P<0.005)显著相关,但与LRFS无关。
尽管接受了标准剂量的基于蒽环类的化疗,TN和BL癌症的临床预后仍然较差。需要替代化疗方案和/或新的治疗方法。虽然TN和基底样肿瘤之间存在显著的表型重叠,但TN表型并非基底样乳腺癌的理想替代标志物。