Harpole W Stanley, Suding Katharine N
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, 321 Steinhaus Hall, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Ecol Lett. 2007 Dec;10(12):1164-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01115.x. Epub 2007 Oct 6.
It is the combination of large fitness differences and strong stabilizing mechanisms that often constitute niche-based explanations for species abundance patterns. Despite the importance of this assumption to much of community ecology, empirical evidence is surprisingly limited. Empirical tests are critical because many abundance patterns are also consistent with neutral-based alternatives (that assume no fitness differences or stabilization). We quantified interactions of four annual grassland species in two-species mixtures at varying frequencies. We found evidence of strong negative frequency-dependent stabilization, where scaled population growth rates increased with decreasing frequency for all four species. There was also a consistent competitive hierarchy among these species indicative of strong fitness differences that, in most cases, suggested potential competitive exclusion despite the observed strong stabilization.
正是巨大的适合度差异和强大的稳定机制的结合,常常构成了基于生态位对物种丰富度模式的解释。尽管这一假设对许多群落生态学至关重要,但实证证据却出奇地有限。实证检验至关重要,因为许多丰富度模式也与基于中性的替代假设(即假设不存在适合度差异或稳定性)相一致。我们对四种一年生草地物种在不同频率的两物种混合群落中的相互作用进行了量化。我们发现了强烈的负频率依赖稳定性的证据,即所有四个物种的标度化种群增长率都随着频率的降低而增加。这些物种之间还存在一致的竞争等级制度,表明存在巨大的适合度差异,在大多数情况下,尽管观察到有很强的稳定性,但仍暗示着潜在的竞争排斥。