Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA.
Ecol Lett. 2010 Aug 1;13(8):1019-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01496.x. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
Despite decades of research documenting niche differences between species, we lack a quantitative understanding of their effect on coexistence in natural communities. We perturbed an empirical sagebrush steppe community model to remove the demographic effect of niche differences and quantify their impact on coexistence. With stabilizing mechanisms operating, all species showed positive growth rates when rare, generating stable coexistence. Fluctuation-independent mechanisms contributed more than temporal variability to coexistence and operated more strongly on recruitment than growth or survival. As expected, removal of stabilizing niche differences led to extinction of all inferior competitors. However, complete exclusion required 300-400 years, indicating small fitness differences among species. Our results show an 'excess' of niche differences: stabilizing mechanisms were not only strong enough to maintain diversity but were much stronger than necessary given the small fitness differences. The diversity of this community cannot be understood without consideration of niche differences.
尽管数十年来的研究记录了物种之间的生态位差异,但我们缺乏对其在自然群落中共存影响的定量理解。我们通过干扰一个经验性的山艾灌丛草原群落模型来消除生态位差异的人口统计学效应,并量化其对共存的影响。在稳定机制的作用下,所有物种在稀有时都表现出正的增长率,从而产生稳定的共存。不依赖于波动的机制对共存的贡献大于时间变异性,并且对繁殖的作用比生长或存活更强。正如预期的那样,去除稳定的生态位差异导致所有劣势竞争者的灭绝。然而,完全排除需要 300-400 年,这表明物种之间的适应性差异很小。我们的结果表明存在“过多”的生态位差异:稳定机制不仅足够强大以维持多样性,而且比考虑到小的适应性差异所必需的强度还要大。如果不考虑生态位差异,就无法理解这个群落的多样性。