Castela José, Ferreira Verónica, Graça Manuel A S
Departamento de Zoologia and IMAR-CIC, Universidade de Coimbra, Largo Marquês de Pombal, 3004-517 Coimbra, Portugal.
Environ Pollut. 2008 May;153(2):440-9. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.08.005. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
Biomonitoring programs to access the ecological integrity of freshwaters tend to rely exclusively on structural parameters. Here we evaluated stream ecological integrity using (a) benthic macroinvertebrate derived metrics and a biotic index as measures of structural integrity and (b) oak litter decomposition and associated fungal sporulation rates as measures of functional integrity. The study was done at four sites (S1, S2, S3 and S4) along a downstream increasing phosphorus and habitat degradation gradient in a small stream. The biotic index, invertebrate metrics, invertebrate and fungal communities' structure and sporulation rates discriminated upstream and downstream sites. Decomposition rates classified sites S4 and S2 as having a compromised ecosystem functioning. Although both functional and structural approaches gave the same results for the most impacted site (S4), they were complementary for moderately impacted sites (S2 and S3), and we therefore support the need for incorporating functional measures in evaluations of stream ecological integrity.
用于评估淡水生态完整性的生物监测项目往往完全依赖于结构参数。在此,我们利用(a)底栖大型无脊椎动物衍生指标和生物指数作为结构完整性的衡量标准,以及(b)橡树叶凋落物分解和相关真菌孢子形成率作为功能完整性的衡量标准,对溪流生态完整性进行了评估。该研究在一条小溪中沿着下游磷含量增加和栖息地退化梯度的四个地点(S1、S2、S3和S4)进行。生物指数、无脊椎动物指标、无脊椎动物和真菌群落结构以及孢子形成率区分了上游和下游地点。分解率将S4和S2地点归类为生态系统功能受损。尽管功能和结构方法对受影响最严重的地点(S4)得出了相同的结果,但它们对中度受影响的地点(S2和S3)具有互补性,因此我们支持在溪流生态完整性评估中纳入功能指标的必要性。