Sandler Jen
University of Wisconsin-Madison, 530 Church Street, Madison, WI 48109, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 2007 Dec;40(3-4):272-89. doi: 10.1007/s10464-007-9131-2.
This paper critically reviews two diverse intellectual traditions concerned with community-based interventions: the literature on dissemination of community interventions and the critical psychology literature that is concerned with systemic power inequalities and structural injustice. The dominant dissemination-of-innovations framework has shifted toward an emphasis on community, yet it does not generally take into account issues of power and inequality within the diverse community spheres into which interventions are disseminated. On the other hand, critical psychologists, who have concerned themselves with both understanding and addressing issues of power and structural injustice, have tended to eschew the possibility of standardizing and making transferable practices, programs, and even processes that address these issues in particular settings. This paper traces and critiques both sides of this divide within community psychology, positing a framework to bring these diverse intellectual resources together so that community interventions might fruitfully be examined in terms of their community-based practices, or practices that bear on structural injustice. This framework is illustrated with a case study of the community-based practices of a widely disseminated evidence-based community intervention.
关于社区干预措施传播的文献,以及关注系统性权力不平等和结构性不公正的批判心理学文献。占主导地位的创新传播框架已转向强调社区,但它通常没有考虑到干预措施所传播到的不同社区领域内的权力和不平等问题。另一方面,关注理解和解决权力及结构性不公正问题的批判心理学家,往往回避在特定环境中规范和推广解决这些问题的实践、项目甚至流程的可能性。本文追溯并批判了社区心理学中这种分歧的双方,提出了一个框架,将这些不同的学术资源整合在一起,以便能从基于社区的实践,或与结构性不公正相关的实践方面,卓有成效地审视社区干预措施。通过对一种广泛传播的循证社区干预措施的社区实践进行案例研究,对这一框架进行了说明。