Schensul Jean J, Trickett Edison
Am J Community Psychol. 2009 Jun;43(3-4):232-40. doi: 10.1007/s10464-009-9238-8.
This introduction to a special issue of the American Journal of Community Psychiatry is the result of a symposium at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Applied Anthropology, 2006, that brought together anthropologists and psychologists involved in community based collaborative intervention studies to examine critically the assumptions, processes and results of their multilevel interventions in local communities with local partners. The papers were an effort to examine context by offering a theoretical framework for the concept of "level" in intervention science, and advocating for "multi-level" approaches to social/behavioral change. They presented examples of ways in which interventions targeted social "levels" either simultaneously or sequentially by working together with communities across levels, and drawing on and co-constructing elements of local culture as components of the intervention. The papers raised a number of important issues, for example: (1) How are levels defined and how should collaborators be chosen; (2) does it matter at which level multilevel interventions begin; (3) do multilevel interventions have a greater effect on desired outcomes than level-specific interventions; (4) are multilevel interventions more sustainable; (5) are multilevel interventions cost effective to run, and evaluate; (6) how can theories of intervention be generated and adapted to each level of a multilevel intervention; (7) how should intervention activities at each level coordinate to facilitate community resident or target population empowerment? Many of these questions were only partially addressed in the papers presented at that time, and are more fully addressed in the theoretical papers, case studies and approach to evaluation included in this collection.
本期《美国社区精神病学杂志》特刊的引言源自2006年应用人类学会年会上举办的一场研讨会,该研讨会汇聚了参与社区合作干预研究的人类学家和心理学家,旨在批判性地审视他们与当地合作伙伴在当地社区开展的多层次干预的假设、过程和结果。这些论文致力于通过为干预科学中的“层次”概念提供理论框架来审视背景,并倡导采用“多层次”方法实现社会/行为改变。论文展示了一些干预方法的实例,即通过与不同层次的社区合作,同时或相继针对社会“层次”开展干预,并借鉴和共同构建当地文化元素作为干预的组成部分。这些论文提出了许多重要问题,例如:(1)如何定义层次以及应如何选择合作伙伴;(2)多层次干预从哪个层次开始是否重要;(3)多层次干预对预期结果的影响是否比特定层次干预更大;(4)多层次干预是否更具可持续性;(5)开展和评估多层次干预是否具有成本效益;(6)如何生成干预理论并使其适用于多层次干预的每个层次;(7)每个层次的干预活动应如何协调以促进社区居民或目标人群的赋权?当时提交的论文仅部分回答了其中许多问题,而本论文集收录的理论论文、案例研究和评估方法则更全面地探讨了这些问题。