Manschreck Theo C, Boshes Roger A
Harvard Commonwealth of Massachusetts Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, John C. Corrigan Mental Health Center, Fall River, MA 02720, USA.
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2007 Sep-Oct;15(5):245-58. doi: 10.1080/10673220701679838.
The CATIE (Clinical Antipsychotic Trials for Intervention Effectiveness) Schizophrenia Trial was designed to examine fundamental issues about second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) medications (olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, and ziprasidone) - their relative effectiveness and their effectiveness compared to a first-generation antipsychotic (FGA), perphenazine. This article reviews these and other findings from this important trial and offers a perspective regarding their meaning for practice and their significance for the advancement of research in psychiatry. The primary outcome measure, time to discontinuation, served as an index of effectiveness and was remarkably short; only 26% of subjects completed the 18-month trial on the medicine to which they were initially randomized. Subjects receiving olanzapine experienced a slightly longer time to discontinuation. Based on this single criterion, olanzapine showed greater effectiveness than the other agents despite its association with significant metabolic disturbance, especially weight gain. Perphenazine unexpectedly showed comparable levels of effectiveness and produced no more extrapyramidal side effects than the other agents. Despite modest prolactin elevation, risperidone was the best-tolerated medication. Ziprasidone was associated with weight loss and with positive impact on lipids and blood glucose. In Phase 2, clozapine demonstrated better effectiveness compared to other SGAs for subjects who discontinued their Phase 1 medication because of efficacy. Olanzapine and risperidone showed greater effectiveness in the tolerability pathway. CATIE secondary outcomes are currently being examined. Improvements in cognition were modest among all the agents in Phase 1, and perphenazine was no less effective in improving cognitive performance than the SGAs. Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed a significant advantage for perphenazine, due to the impact of the high-priced, brand-name SGAs on overall health care costs.
“临床抗精神病药物干预有效性试验”(CATIE)精神分裂症试验旨在研究有关第二代抗精神病药物(SGA,包括奥氮平、利培酮、喹硫平和齐拉西酮)的基本问题——它们的相对有效性以及与第一代抗精神病药物(FGA)奋乃静相比的有效性。本文回顾了这项重要试验的这些及其他发现,并就其对实践的意义以及对精神病学研究进展的重要性提供了一种观点。主要结局指标——停药时间,作为有效性指标,其时间非常短;最初随机分组用药的受试者中只有26%完成了18个月的试验。接受奥氮平治疗的受试者停药时间略长。基于这一单一标准,尽管奥氮平与显著的代谢紊乱尤其是体重增加有关,但它比其他药物显示出更高的有效性。奋乃静出人意料地显示出相当的有效性水平,且产生的锥体外系副作用并不比其他药物多。尽管催乳素略有升高,但利培酮是耐受性最好的药物。齐拉西酮与体重减轻以及对血脂和血糖有积极影响有关。在第二阶段,对于因疗效不佳而停用第一阶段药物的受试者,氯氮平与其他SGA相比显示出更好的有效性。奥氮平和利培酮在耐受性方面显示出更高的有效性。CATIE的次要结局目前正在研究中。在第一阶段所有药物中认知功能的改善都很有限,且奋乃静在改善认知表现方面并不比SGA效果差。成本效益分析显示奋乃静具有显著优势,这是由于高价品牌SGA对总体医疗保健成本的影响。