Angioplasty and stenting versus carotid-subclavian bypass for the treatment of isolated subclavian artery disease.

PURPOSE

To compare the results of a large series of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)/stenting procedures in the subclavian artery with the results of a series of carotid-subclavian bypass grafts (CSBG) performed at the same institution for subclavian artery disease.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2006, 121 patients (43 men; mean age 63 years, range 38-85) underwent subclavian artery PTA/stenting and were compared to a group of 51 patients (29 men; mean age 62 years, range 46-75) with isolated subclavian artery occlusive disease treated with CSBG using polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Graft or PTA/stenting patency was determined clinically and confirmed by Doppler pressures and/or duplex ultrasound/angiography. The cumulative patency and overall survival rates were calculated using the life-table method.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up for the PTA/stent group was 3.4 years versus 7.7 years for the CSBG group. The technical success rate for the CSBG group was 100% versus 98% (119/121) for the PTA/stent group. The overall perioperative complication rate in the stent group was 15.1% (18/119: 11 minor and 7 major complications) versus 5.9% (3/51: 2 phrenic nerve palsy and 1 myocardial infarction) in the bypass group (p=0.093). There was no perioperative stroke or mortality in the CSBG group. The major perioperative complications in the stent group included 4 thromboembolic events, 1 congestive heart failure, 1 reperfusion arm edema, and 1 pseudoaneurysm. There was 1 perioperative death in the stent group. The 30-day patency rate was 100% for the bypass group and 97% (118/121) for the PTA/stent group. The primary patency rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 100%, 98%, and 96% for the CSBG group versus 93%, 78%, and 70% for the stent group, respectively (p<0.0001). Freedom from symptom recurrence was also statistically superior in the bypass group versus the stent group (p<0.0001). There were no significant differences in the survival rates between both groups at any time point (p=0.322).

CONCLUSION

Both CSBGs using PTFE grafts and subclavian PTA/stenting are safe, effective, and durable; however, CSBG is more durable in the long term. PTA/stenting of the subclavian artery should be the procedure of choice for high-risk patients; however, CSBG should be offered to good-risk surgical candidates who may be seeking a more durable procedure.