Suppr超能文献

跨国视角下的精神疾病。巴西和德国针对老年人的社区调查结果。

Mental illness in a cross-national perspective. Results from a Brazilian and a German community survey among the elderly.

作者信息

Blay S L, Bickel H, Cooper B

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1991 Dec;26(6):245-51. doi: 10.1007/BF00789215.

Abstract

Findings for unselected samples for the elderly in two urban populations - one in Mannheim, Germany (n = 418) and the other in Sao Paulo, Brazil (n = 111) - are compared and contrasted. Each study was restricted to persons aged over 65 years living in private households, and each employed a single-stage method of psychiatric case-identification, based on the Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS). Apart from marked differences in educational standards and proportions living alone the two samples were broadly similar in their recorded socio-demographic characteristics. Comparison revealed no significant difference in total prevalence, though there was a trend towards a higher case-frequency in Sao Paulo (29.7%) than in Mannheim (23.3%). The clinical-item profiles for the two samples indicated a higher rate of symptom reporting in Sao Paulo, whereas the Mannheim sample had higher mean scores for a number of psychiatric abnormalities observed at interview. Separate cluster analyses carried out on the two data sets divided the samples into four pairs of sub-groups with similar clinical profiles, which were designated respectively as 'organic', 'depressive', 'neurotic' and 'normal'. While a more careful standardization of method would probably reduce the observed disparities between the samples, some of these are thought to be real and to relate to sociocultural differences, as well as to the greater stresses of daily life in Sao Paulo.

摘要

对德国曼海姆(n = 418)和巴西圣保罗(n = 111)两个城市中未经过挑选的老年人群样本的研究结果进行了比较和对比。每项研究都局限于居住在私人家庭中的65岁以上人群,并且每项研究都采用了基于临床访谈表(CIS)的单阶段精神病病例识别方法。除了教育水平和独居比例存在显著差异外,两个样本在记录的社会人口学特征方面大致相似。比较发现总患病率没有显著差异,尽管圣保罗(29.7%)的病例频率有高于曼海姆(23.3%)的趋势。两个样本的临床项目概况表明,圣保罗的症状报告率较高,而曼海姆样本在访谈中观察到的一些精神异常方面平均得分较高。对两个数据集分别进行的聚类分析将样本分为四对具有相似临床概况的亚组,分别命名为“器质性”、“抑郁性”、“神经质性”和“正常”。虽然更仔细的方法标准化可能会减少样本之间观察到的差异,但其中一些差异被认为是真实的,与社会文化差异以及圣保罗更大的日常生活压力有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验