Bellis Lia, Nicodemo Sabino, Galossi Alessandra, Guarisco Riccardo, Spilabotti Lucia, Durola Laura, Dell'Unto Orlando, Puoti Claudio
Haemodynamic Unit, Marino General Hospital, Via XXIV Maggio, 00047 Marino, Rome, Italy.
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2007 Sep;16(3):273-7.
To evaluate whether the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) differs between cirrhotic patients with severe portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) and those with mild or absent PHG.
59 cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension underwent hepatic vein catheterisation. 44 patients (76%) had PHG (16 mild and 28 severe).
tertiary care setting (Liver Unit, Internal Medicine).
HVPG values did not differ between the patients without PHG (21.6 +/- 10.1 mmHg) and those with PHG (18.6 +/- 9.1 mmHg), nor between those with mild (19.3 +/- 4.3 mmHg) or severe PHG (17.7 +/- 4.6 mmHg; p = 0.26). The overall prevalence of PHG and the proportion of patients with severe PHG did not differ regarding the Child Pugh classification. The etiology of the cirrhosis did not influence the HVPG. No correlations were found between HVPG values and Child Pugh score, age, platelet count, prothrombin time, bilirubin levels and ALT values. The HVPG did not differ between patients with small, medium or large esophageal varices, nor between subjects with or without gastric varices.
Our data show that PHG does not correlate with the degree of portal pressure, and that the prevalence and the severity of this condition are not influenced by the severity of underlying liver disease or by the size of varices.
评估重度门静脉高压性胃病(PHG)的肝硬化患者与轻度或无PHG的肝硬化患者之间肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)是否存在差异。
59例门静脉高压的肝硬化患者接受了肝静脉插管。44例患者(76%)患有PHG(16例轻度,28例重度)。
三级医疗中心(肝病科,内科)。
无PHG的患者(21.6±10.1 mmHg)与有PHG的患者(18.6±9.1 mmHg)之间的HVPG值无差异,轻度PHG患者(19.3±4.3 mmHg)与重度PHG患者(17.7±4.6 mmHg;p = 0.26)之间的HVPG值也无差异。就Child Pugh分类而言,PHG的总体患病率和重度PHG患者的比例无差异。肝硬化的病因不影响HVPG。未发现HVPG值与Child Pugh评分、年龄、血小板计数、凝血酶原时间、胆红素水平及ALT值之间存在相关性。小、中、大食管静脉曲张患者之间的HVPG无差异,有或无胃静脉曲张的患者之间的HVPG也无差异。
我们的数据表明,PHG与门静脉压力程度无关,且这种情况的患病率和严重程度不受潜在肝病严重程度或静脉曲张大小的影响。