Suppr超能文献

固定方式和桥体跨度对种植固定局部义齿应变发展的影响。

Influence of fixation mode and superstructure span upon strain development of implant fixed partial dentures.

作者信息

Karl Matthias, Wichmann Manfred G, Winter Werner, Graef Friedrich, Taylor Thomas D, Heckmann Siegfried M

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Erlangen, Glueckstrasse 11, Nuremberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2008 Jan;17(1):3-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00236.x. Epub 2007 Oct 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Implant-borne fixed partial dentures (FPDs) should fit passively in order to avoid complications ranging from screw loosening to loss of osseointegration. The aim of this study was to measure the strain development of three-unit and five-unit screw- and cement-retained implant-supported FPDs. Additionally, the influence of the parameters retention mechanism and FPD span were evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three Straumann implants were anchored in a measurement model based on a real-life patient situation and strain gauges (SGs) were fixed mesially and distally adjacent to the implants and on the pontics of the superstructures. During cement setting and screw fixation of 40 implant FPDs (10 samples from each group: three-unit cementable; five-unit cementable; three-unit screw-retained; five-unit screw-retained), strain development was recorded. For statistical analysis, multivariate two-sample tests were performed with the level of significance set at p= 0.1.

RESULTS

The mean strain values for the four FPD groups at the different SG sites ranged from 26.0 to 637.6 microm/m. When comparing the four groups, no significant differences in strain magnitude could be detected. Similarly, a comparison of the two FPD spans revealed no significant difference (p= 0.18 for cementable FPDs; p= 0.22 for screw-retained FPDs). A comparison of the two fixation modes also revealed no significant difference (p= 0.67 for three-unit FPDs; p= 0.25 for five-unit FPDs).

CONCLUSION

FPD span and retention mechanism appear to have only a minor influence on strain development in implant FPDs. As implant-supported restorations have proven to be successful over time, the question arises as to whether an "absolute" passive fit is a prerequisite for successful implant restorations.

摘要

目的

种植体支持的固定局部义齿(FPD)应被动就位,以避免从螺钉松动到骨结合丧失等一系列并发症。本研究的目的是测量三单位和五单位螺钉固位及粘结固位的种植体支持FPD的应变发展情况。此外,还评估了固位方式和FPD跨度参数的影响。

材料与方法

根据实际患者情况,在测量模型中植入3枚士卓曼种植体,并在种植体近中和远中以及上部结构的桥体上固定应变片(SG)。在40例种植体FPD(每组10个样本:三单位可粘结型;五单位可粘结型;三单位螺钉固位型;五单位螺钉固位型)的粘结和螺钉固定过程中,记录应变发展情况。进行统计分析时,采用多变量双样本检验,显著性水平设定为p = 0.1。

结果

四个FPD组在不同SG部位的平均应变值范围为26.0至637.6微米/米。比较这四组时,未检测到应变大小的显著差异。同样,比较两种FPD跨度时也未发现显著差异(可粘结型FPD的p = 0.18;螺钉固位型FPD的p = 0.22)。比较两种固位方式时也未发现显著差异(三单位FPD的p = 0.67;五单位FPD的p = 0.25)。

结论

FPD跨度和固位方式似乎对种植体FPD的应变发展影响较小。随着时间的推移,种植体支持的修复体已被证明是成功的,那么“绝对”被动就位是否是成功种植修复的先决条件就成了一个问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验